FYI
The implementation at www.ghostscript.com/doc/jbig2dec/sha1.c
and CryptLib are both from the same original author
Steve Reid
I've now tested and timed both implementations along with the
Android version + openssl.
openssl and Steve's implementations are about twice
Stephen Smalley wrote:
On 10/20/2015 09:42 AM, Joshua Brindle wrote:
Stephen Smalley wrote:
Wondering if dependency on openssl might be a license issue for Debian
or others. Apparently openssl license is considered GPL-incompatible [1]
[2], and obviously libselinux is linked by a variety of
On Oct 20, 2015 7:46 AM, "Stephen Smalley" wrote:
>
> On 10/20/2015 08:27 AM, Richard Haines wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Monday, 19 October 2015, 19:10, Stephen Smalley
wrote:
On 10/18/2015 11:00 AM, Richard Haines wrote:
> On
> On Monday, 19 October 2015, 19:10, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > On 10/18/2015 11:00 AM, Richard Haines wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sunday, 18 October 2015, 15:07, Dominick Grift
> wrote:
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA512
On Tuesday, 20 October 2015, 15:00, William Roberts
wrote:
>
>
>
>On Oct 20, 2015 7:46 AM, "Stephen Smalley" wrote:
>>
>> On 10/20/2015 08:27 AM, Richard Haines wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Monday, 19 October 2015, 19:10, Stephen Smalley
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:56:57AM -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote:
> Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > On 10/20/2015 09:42 AM, Joshua Brindle wrote:
> >> Stephen Smalley wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Wondering if dependency on openssl might be a license issue for Debian
> >>> or others. Apparently openssl
FYI you can take just 1 C and H file from crypt lib. You don't need it all.
On Oct 20, 2015 8:42 AM, "Richard Haines"
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 20 October 2015, 15:00, William Roberts <
> bill.c.robe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >On Oct 20, 2015 7:46 AM,
On 10/20/2015 09:42 AM, Joshua Brindle wrote:
Stephen Smalley wrote:
Wondering if dependency on openssl might be a license issue for Debian
or others. Apparently openssl license is considered GPL-incompatible [1]
[2], and obviously libselinux is linked by a variety of GPL-licensed
programs.
Stephen Smalley wrote:
Wondering if dependency on openssl might be a license issue for Debian
or others. Apparently openssl license is considered GPL-incompatible [1]
[2], and obviously libselinux is linked by a variety of GPL-licensed
programs. Fedora seems to view this as falling under the
On 10/20/2015 08:27 AM, Richard Haines wrote:
On Monday, 19 October 2015, 19:10, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On 10/18/2015 11:00 AM, Richard Haines wrote:
On Sunday, 18 October 2015, 15:07, Dominick Grift
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
On 10/19/2015 02:09 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On 10/18/2015 11:00 AM, Richard Haines wrote:
On Sunday, 18 October 2015, 15:07, Dominick Grift
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:48:12PM +, Richard Haines wrote:
I added openssl to libselinux to support the new selabel_digest(3)
function.
I'm not aware of any issues between openssl and gnutls, however as
selabel_digest was only added last week I guess not much testing.
Well apart from myself as I'm currently adding the selinux_restorecon
feature that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:48:12PM +, Richard Haines wrote:
> I added openssl to libselinux to support the new selabel_digest(3)
> function.
>
> I'm not aware of any issues between openssl and gnutls, however as
>
> selabel_digest was only
> On Sunday, 18 October 2015, 15:07, Dominick Grift
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:48:12PM +, Richard Haines wrote:
>> I added openssl to libselinux to support the new selabel_digest(3)
>> function.
14 matches
Mail list logo