MovGP0 wrote:
> Therefore I suggest to let Wikipedia use only one big ontology, even
> when Wikipedia itself gets separated into serval atomic Wikis. Further
> it is a current design-goal to don't let users link to external
> Ontologies because of this unsolved Versioning- and Trust-Problems.
>
Lukasz Bolikowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just started my PhD research on synchronizing knowledge
> between language versions of semantically-annotated Wikipedia
> (suggesting updates and corrections in individual versions based
> on the consensus knowledge). One of the problems is to obtain
> (or
S Page wrote:
> If this approach worked, you could use such a machine translator as a
> translation assistant to add facts to SMW pages in other languages. I
> would use it simply to display what other languages currently think are
> the facts about a topic, e.g. Pope John Paul II in Polish or
Lukasz Bolikowski wrote:
> I have just started my PhD research on synchronizing knowledge
> between language versions of semantically-annotated Wikipedia
> (suggesting updates and corrections in individual versions based
> on the consensus knowledge). One of the problems is to obtain
> (or create
Hi,
I have just started my PhD research on synchronizing knowledge
between language versions of semantically-annotated Wikipedia
(suggesting updates and corrections in individual versions based
on the consensus knowledge). One of the problems is to obtain
(or create) semantic annotation in a coup
