Jürgen Hoffmann wrote:
> > > But please stop complaining about how long Unit Tests take,
> > You might notice that Danny and others also commented on the issue, and
no
> > one disagreed that it was a concern.
> I think Testing is very important.
So do I. That's why I added run-unit-tests to the
Hi,
see below
Juergen
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 13. November 2006 00:32
An: James Developers List
Betreff: RE: Emacs and Eclipse
Jürgen Hoffmann wrote:
> No one on this list is telling you to use one, nor telling you
> t
Jürgen Hoffmann wrote:
> No one on this list is telling you to use one, nor telling you
> that they are so much better. You asked if it is possible to
> run one single Unit Test.
And since no one else knew how, I took care of it.
> But please stop complaining about how long Unit Tests take,
You
Hi Noel,
it is silly to think, that one has to change the source tree, or anything,
so one can build JAMES using an IDE. Your Arguments show me that you are
trying to defend yourself because you are not using such a tool. The
question is "why?" No one on this list is telling you to use one, nor
te
Steve Brewin wrote:
> DISCLAIMER: I've no interest of getting involved in IDE wars
Neither do I. My arguement is that we shouldn't bias the project to require
such silly things.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
Some notes on how to develop, run, debug and profile James using
NetBeans can now be found in
http://wiki.apache.org/james/NetBeansNotes
Vincenzo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [
Noel J. Bergman
>
> > > > > I will think about using Eclipse when it has an
> editor worthy of
> > > > > being called one.
> > > > > Then you probably want to try Intellij IDEA.
> > > Really? Does it integrate with emacs -- The One True Editor? ;-)
>
> Also see:
> http://asynchronous.org/blog/arc
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 11:19:20AM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > > > > I will think about using Eclipse when it has an editor worthy of
> > > > > being called one.
> > > > > Then you probably want to try Intellij IDEA.
> > > Really? Does it integrate with emacs -- The One True Editor? ;-)
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-669?page=comments#action_12449162 ]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on JAMES-669:
-
This may well be fixed by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-689
> ImapServer sometimes throws N
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-689?page=all ]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated JAMES-689:
Attachment: imap-status.patch
Unfortunately, this is a compound patch. It:
1 Sets loggers for many IMAP components
2 Patches status command to o
[PATCH] configure loggers and fix for status command
Key: JAMES-689
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-689
Project: James
Issue Type: Bug
Components: IMAPServer
On 11/12/06, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi robert,
the imap development was merged to the trunk code. And sure we are
always intressted in patches :-)
great :-)
there an issue on evolution startup: StatusCommand is called before a
mailbox has been selected. however, reading the
On 11/8/06, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So we'll wait for further news from you in the next weeks. Thank you for
> the update.
You are welcome :-)
Thanks again! I read the howto and it looks pretty straight forward.
How feasible do you think it will be to have a second shell
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i've been having problems with my old email server. so i thought i'd
give IMAP on james a try.
i'm running an evolution client but it's giving me issues. i'd like to
be able to work out what's going wrong and maybe feed back some fixes
or unit tests.
Cool!
1 is I
Hi robert,
the imap development was merged to the trunk code. And sure we are
always intressted in patches :-)
bye
Norman
robert burrell donkin schrieb:
(sorry: sent prematurely)
On 11/12/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i've been having problems with my old email serv
(sorry: sent prematurely)
On 11/12/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i've been having problems with my old email server. so i thought i'd
give IMAP on james a try.
i'm running an evolution client but it's giving me issues. i'd like to
be able to work out what's going wrong an
i've been having problems with my old email server. so i thought i'd
give IMAP on james a try.
i'm running an evolution client but it's giving me issues. i'd like to
be able to work out what's going wrong and maybe feed back some fixes
or unit tests.
1 is IMAP development still happening on the
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
+1 for the dist: it is where the real check has to be forced.
In other scenario it won't help forcing something.
Agreed.
+1
The long-running tests issues is solved using a decent CI environment.
We do have nightly builds
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
mvn test -Dtest=SMTPServerTest
Ant, apparently, supports the same.
--- Noel
No. Ant needs 20 custom lines in the build.xml: they have to be mantained.
It is not the same :-)
Btw I think that even things that make one single active committer more
happy are goo
19 matches
Mail list logo