RE: The Phoenix reborn -- Plexus returning to the ASF

Projects in the Incubator have one set of issues to deal with (Incubator policies); projects that *use* them, have others. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [JSieve] pom's in stage

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > On 10/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >>> On 10/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The alternative is still the #3 from the original post: > 3) change the dependencies groupdIds/artifact

Re: [JSieve] pom's in stage

On 10/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > On 10/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The alternative is still the #3 from the original post: > >>> 3) change the dependencies groupdIds/artifactIds for the "problematic" > >>> artif

Re: The Phoenix reborn -- Plexus returning to the ASF

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > On 10/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I can't find any reference but I thought to remember I read sometimes >> people saying that incubator can make releases but official >> "non-incubator" ASF releases cannot depend/ship incubator products. >

Re: [JSieve] pom's in stage

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > On 10/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The alternative is still the #3 from the original post: >>> 3) change the dependencies groupdIds/artifactIds for the "problematic" >>> artifacts and move them to the new folders. Alter the pom to declare >

Re: The Phoenix reborn -- Plexus returning to the ASF

On 10/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > On 10/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: > >>> See: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal > >>> > >>> --- Noel > >> Thank you for the point

Re: [JSieve] pom's in stage

On 10/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > On 10/5/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > >>> On 10/5/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: > > So the

Re: The Phoenix reborn -- Plexus returning to the ASF

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > On 10/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: >>> See: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal >>> >>> --- Noel >> Thank you for the pointer. I read about this on the plexus list, but I >> think this won't a

Re: The Phoenix reborn -- Plexus returning to the ASF

On 10/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: > > See: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal > > > > --- Noel > > Thank you for the pointer. I read about this on the plexus list, but I > think this won't affect us for a while as: > > 1st: we'

Re: [VOTE] Move spring-deployment module to TRUNK

Am Sonntag, den 07.10.2007, 19:47 +0200 schrieb Bernd Fondermann > > [x] +1, let's include the spring-deployment code in trunk bye Norman - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

RE: The Phoenix reborn -- Plexus returning to the ASF

> AFAIK plexus does not anymore support Avalon out of the box and I > don't see anything about Avalon in the Composer proposal. We'll see, and I've already raised the topic. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [VOTE] Move spring-deployment module to TRUNK

On 10/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: > > I will go on record that I oppose a move to Spring, and have said so on > > multiple occassions. However, I do not oppose optional support for > Spring. > > > > So long as we are agreed on that, I'm +1 to on

Re: The Phoenix reborn -- Plexus returning to the ASF

Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: > See: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal > > --- Noel Thank you for the pointer. I read about this on the plexus list, but I think this won't affect us for a while as: 1st: we'll have to wait for it to be accepted in the incubator, promoted to TL

Re: [VOTE] Move spring-deployment module to TRUNK

Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: > I will go on record that I oppose a move to Spring, and have said so on > multiple occassions. However, I do not oppose optional support for Spring. > > So long as we are agreed on that, I'm +1 to on the latter. I think I can confirm that the support is optional. T

The Phoenix reborn -- Plexus returning to the ASF

See: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [VOTE] Move spring-deployment module to TRUNK

I will go on record that I oppose a move to Spring, and have said so on multiple occassions. However, I do not oppose optional support for Spring. So long as we are agreed on that, I'm +1 to on the latter. > As a consequence, we would be able to release a Spring-container-based > Server runtime

Re: [VOTE] Move spring-deployment module to TRUNK

+1 Vincenzo Bernd Fondermann wrote: > Hi, > > As proposed in a previous mail, we should make the spring-deployment > part of trunk. > As a consequence, we would be able to release a Spring-container-based > Server runtime besides our regular Avalon-based. > > Please cast your vote to execute >

Re: [JSieve] pom's in stage

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > On 10/5/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >>> On 10/5/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: > So the options we have are: 4) Another option is to simply remove th