Re: Apache James top-level description

2020-05-22 Thread David Leangen
>> Does this go in the right direction? > > Yes Thank you once again, Benoit. I will take the documentation in this direction, then. Cheers, =David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For

Re: Apache James top-level description

2020-05-22 Thread Tellier Benoit
Hi David, On 23/05/2020 04:16, David Leangen wrote: > > Hi! > > Based on things that Benoit has been explaining to me (in threads such as > [1], [2]), I have been thinking about the top-level description of James. > > [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/server-dev@james.apache.org/msg65858.html

Apache James top-level description

2020-05-22 Thread David Leangen
Hi! Based on things that Benoit has been explaining to me (in threads such as [1], [2]), I have been thinking about the top-level description of James. [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/server-dev@james.apache.org/msg65858.html

Re: [jsieve] RFC5882 or RFC882

2020-05-22 Thread David Leangen
> Yet another bg topic. :-) > Mime4J is an effort to remove that dependency in James. There is still a > lot of work to do to reach that goal (most notably in the mailet-container). Is that what the DOM is for? I.e., is this supposed to be the MIME message you are talking about? —>

Re: Hexagonal Architecture - definitions of fundamental concepts

2020-05-22 Thread David Leangen
>> Thanks Benoit, very helpful! It does lead to more questions, though. :-) > > The contrary would have surprised me ;-) Thanks again! There is a lot to digest here. All this information has been really useful. I will try to put my thoughts together by advancing with the documentation before

Re: Hexagonal Architecture - definitions of fundamental concepts

2020-05-22 Thread Tellier Benoit
On 22/05/2020 18:06, David Leangen wrote: > Thanks Benoit, very helpful! It does lead to more questions, though. :-) The contrary would have surprised me ;-) I have been yet again quitte verbose once again, don't hesitate to raise a warning if the signal/noise ratio gets to low... Cheers, >

Re: [jsieve] RFC5882 or RFC882

2020-05-22 Thread Tellier Benoit
On 22/05/2020 17:19, David Leangen wrote: >>> Perhaps provide a “default” MailAdapter? In that case, then the factory >>> could even just take an email and a SieveScript InputStream and apply the >>> default MailAdapter. The method with the MailAdapter signature would only >>> be needed for

Re: Hexagonal Architecture - definitions of fundamental concepts

2020-05-22 Thread David Leangen
Thanks Benoit, very helpful! It does lead to more questions, though. :-) > - **mailet** are separated in an effort to serve as a specification for... > - **mailbox** as presented below is a storage service for the server…. > - **protocols** is an effort to provide mail protocol utility for... >

Re: [jsieve] RFC5882 or RFC882

2020-05-22 Thread David Leangen
>> Perhaps provide a “default” MailAdapter? In that case, then the factory >> could even just take an email and a SieveScript InputStream and apply the >> default MailAdapter. The method with the MailAdapter signature would only be >> needed for custom MailAdapters. > > JSIEVE (core) don't

Re: [jsieve] RFC5882 or RFC882

2020-05-22 Thread Tellier Benoit
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSIEVE-116 based on this thread. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

[jira] [Created] (JSIEVE-116) Simplify JSieve API

2020-05-22 Thread Benoit Tellier (Jira)
Benoit Tellier created JSIEVE-116: - Summary: Simplify JSieve API Key: JSIEVE-116 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSIEVE-116 Project: James jSieve Issue Type: Improvement

Re: [jsieve] RFC5882 or RFC882

2020-05-22 Thread Tellier Benoit
[...] >> - The SieveFactory takes a SieveScript inputstream, and a Mail adapter, >> and returns a list of Action that results from the sieve script >> execution against the supplied email. > > +1 > > Perhaps provide a “default” MailAdapter? In that case, then the factory could > even just take

Re: [jsieve] RFC5882 or RFC882

2020-05-22 Thread David Leangen
Thanks for the comments. >> So I gather than the email must be RFC882 compliant, which means that its >> implementing class must also be RFC882 compliant. Further, the implementing >> class must also be RFC5228 compliant. So the email object must effectively >> be both RFC882 **AND** RFC5882

Re: [jsieve] RFC5882 or RFC882

2020-05-22 Thread Tellier Benoit
Hi David. It looks like you struggled much with badly written javadoc... > (I am assuming that “RFC32028” is actually RFC3028 [5], which should be > updated to RFC5228 [6]). That typo needs to be fixed. > So I gather than the email must be RFC882 compliant, which means that its >

Re: Hexagonal Architecture - definitions of fundamental concepts

2020-05-22 Thread Tellier Benoit
Hello David, > I know you are all probably very busy, but to allow my contribution to be useful, it would be very nice to get comments on my journey so far. If I don’t document the “right” thing and run out of time, it would be a wasted opportunity. :-( 100% agree with that. Don't hesitate if

[jira] [Created] (JAMES-3193) Update Developer Guide

2020-05-22 Thread David Leangen (Jira)
David Leangen created JAMES-3193: Summary: Update Developer Guide Key: JAMES-3193 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3193 Project: James Server Issue Type: Task