+1
On 29/01/2025 14:56, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a new vote for 3.8.2 release of the Apache
James server.
You can find:
- The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
#1090:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-10
+1
On 23/12/2024 07:36, [email protected] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.12 release of the Apache
MIME4J library.
You can find:
- The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
#1088:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories
Hi,
I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.12 release of the Apache
MIME4J library.
You can find:
- The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
#1088:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-108/
This release ships MIME4J-327 LenientAddr
Hi folks,
Sorry for the late reply, I was on a work business trip and struggled to
get time to answer to this thread.
This gave a bit of time to:
- realize that multiple visions of what a tenant is exists
- getting multi-tenancy is more of a Linagora need that a community need.
Regarding Ma
Hello Jan,
I recently worked on https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/2445
which brings access to other user mailbox in IMAP
It:
- Defines clear interface for converting MailboxPath into IMAP mailbox
name
- Provides a default implementation exposing private mailbox, and
other users
Hello,
I think the scanning search is still used outside of the memory application.
We do not need to drop it, just stop using it in the memory application,
and use the Lucene-based implementation for it.
On 30/09/2024 12:36, Tran Tung wrote:
Hello folks,
At the Linagora team, we are planni
Hello Jean!
Thanks a lot for the initiative.
I and Eugen had been doing that several time in the last few years,
though I agree the JIRA backlog is still messy.
Answers inlined.
Best regards
On 30/08/2024 09:42, Jean Helou wrote:
Hello,
You might wonder what I'm doing with jira. I'm tryin
Hello,
Thanks for bringing the roadmap refresher topic up!
Should we add as well a roadmap section in Antora doc for example?
Duplicated information is a recipe for partial updates and consistency
issues.
(True with Cassandra, even more with humans)
So IMO -1.
On 28/08/2024 08:20, Jea
+1
On 22/08/2024 09:28, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
Sorry I screw up the voting dates:
- The vote starts at Thurdsay 22nd of August 2024, 9am UTC+2
- The vote ends at Thurdsay 29th of August 2024, 9am UTC+2
Best regards,
Benoit
On 22/08/2024 09:26, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
Hi,
I would like to pro
+1
On 16/07/2024 17:13, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a new vote for 1.0.5 release of the Apache
James JSPF library.
You can find:
- The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
#1084:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheja
+1
On 07/06/2024 15:39, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a new vote for 1.0.4 release of the Apache
James JSPF library.
You can find:
- The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
#1083:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheja
I just merged the changelog updates, this should be better now.
On 10/01/2024 11:26, Jean Helou wrote:
hmm the linked changelog doesn't list any unreleased changes is that normal
?
Le mar. 9 janv. 2024 à 09:17, Benoit TELLIER a écrit :
Hi,
I would like to propose a new vote for 3.8.1 releas
+1
On 09/01/2024 09:17, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a new vote for 3.8.1 release of the Apache
James server.
You can find:
- The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
#1077:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-10
+1
On 09/01/2024 09:15, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.5 release of the Apache
James server.
You can find:
- The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
#1079:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-10
Hello Jerry,
I confirm that different email applications uses the IMAP protocol in
different ways.
I confirm that some clients uses the IMAP SEARCH results upon
resynchronisation, and thus that inacurate results could result in bad
synchronisation.
That being said, having traffic capture f
Hopefully rendered correctly in plain text...
-
Hello Jamers!
As part of my work at Linagora, we are looking toward
- better integrating James within our product suite and for us this
means support "Single Sign On" and "Single Log Out" for JMAP following
Hello Tung,
Thanks for the feedback.
On 03/11/2021 11:24, Tung Tran Van wrote:
> Hello Otto,
> Very interesting,
>
>> Delay on authentication failure (S)
> I will follow how it will be implemented. Right now, I think about Redis
> with expire time key-value, with key is the fingerprint of the cl
+1
On 23/07/2021 16:00, [email protected] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Following a first email on the topic [1] I would like to call for a
> formal vote on Apache James Hupa retirement.
>
> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg70575.html
>
> Rationnals:
> - The latest rele
On 21/07/2021 18:06, Quan tran hong wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
> Thanks for your great reviews.
>
>> Or we can just do several selects, one for each mimeMessageIds.I
> personaly likely prefer this option.
>
> This will make the upper logic layer more complicated. But I agree with
> your suggestion cause
Hello all,
Just a word about this,
The INFRA requests us to armor our signature on the download page,
I received the following message:
|> Sorry, but the download page is still wrong. |||> | |||> |The links for the
hupa artifacts are missing the /hupa/ subdirectory |||> |segment. > ||
|||
A quick follow up to state that
https://github.com/linagora/james-project/pull/4110 implemented that ;-)
Cheers,
Benoit
Le 03/12/2020 à 09:08, [email protected] (OpenPaaS) a écrit :
> Nice to see we are on the same wave length!
>
> Regarding the upgrade path, I'm in favor o
Le 04/12/2020 à 03:21, Jean Helou a écrit :
> Hello fellow jamers !
>
> The Jenkinsfile in the PR works, up until the test suite fails, the tests
> failures are from seemingly "unstable" tests that fail because of timing
> issues. Benoit fixed the first one in
> https://github.com/apache/james-pr
Hi,
I'm currently trying to increase overall efficiency of the Distributed
James server.
As such, I'm pocking around for improvement areas and found a huge topic
around LWT.
My conclusions so far are that we should keep LWT and SERIAL consistency
level out of the most common use cases.
I know t
Nice to see we are on the same wave length!
Regarding the upgrade path, I'm in favor of requiring an empty mailQueue.
Rationals: if there is any sort of retro-compatibility, then an attacker
controlling ie the JMS solution would still be able to control the
deserialized payload (and trigger all s
24 matches
Mail list logo
