On 5/14/07, Steve Brewin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to be clear, for the .jar filenames we are really talking about no
spaces, either camelCased or hyphenated aren't we? Those pesky spaces cause
more trouble than they are worth!
OMG I hope so!
Norman Maurer wrote:
>
>
> Danny Angus schrieb:
> > On 5/14/07, Bernd Fondermann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'd prefer
> >> Apache James Server, Apache mime4j, Apache jspf, as they constitute
> >> products on their own.
> >
> > +1.
> >
> > d.
> >
>
> +1
> Norman
Just to be clear, for the .j
Danny Angus schrieb:
> On 5/14/07, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd prefer
>> Apache James Server, Apache mime4j, Apache jspf, as they constitute
>> products on their own.
>
> +1.
>
> d.
>
+1
Norman
-
To unsubs
+1
Vincenzo
Danny Angus wrote:
On 5/14/07, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd prefer
Apache James Server, Apache mime4j, Apache jspf, as they constitute
products on their own.
+1.
d.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 5/14/07, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd prefer
Apache James Server, Apache mime4j, Apache jspf, as they constitute
products on their own.
+1.
d.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
On 5/14/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you prefer "apache-james-mime4j-0.3.jar" or "apache-mime4j-0.3.jar" ?
In practice: when the project name is already in the james namespace
(server alone does not identify a james product, but jspf, jsieve,
mime4j, postage and mailet do) s
+1
On 5/14/07, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Irrespective of whether or not this is an ASF wide "policy", I would
say that that putting "apache" in James jar names is a practice which
a) we could easily adopt, and b) makes a fair amount of sense, and
therefore I would propose that we do
Do you prefer "apache-james-mime4j-0.3.jar" or "apache-mime4j-0.3.jar" ?
In practice: when the project name is already in the james namespace
(server alone does not identify a james product, but jspf, jsieve,
mime4j, postage and mailet do) should we use "apache-" instead of
"james" or should we us
Danny Angus ha scritto:
> Irrespective of whether or not this is an ASF wide "policy", I would
> say that that putting "apache" in James jar names is a practice which
> a) we could easily adopt, and b) makes a fair amount of sense, and
> therefore I would propose that we do so.
>
> d.
I was alrea
Irrespective of whether or not this is an ASF wide "policy", I would
say that that putting "apache" in James jar names is a practice which
a) we could easily adopt, and b) makes a fair amount of sense, and
therefore I would propose that we do so.
d.
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
