Re: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

2008-08-07 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 21:34, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefano Bagnara wrote: The current process is a simple nighly build [that] is good for the nighlies, but I think I don't have to explain the difference between a real CI environment and a nighly build script. That is

Re: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

2008-08-07 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefano Bagnara wrote: The current process is a simple nighly build [that] is good for the nighlies, but I think I don't have to explain the difference between a real CI environment and

Re: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

2008-08-07 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: Stefano Bagnara wrote: The current process is a simple nighly build [that] is good for the nighlies, but I think I don't have to explain the difference between a real CI environment and a nighly build script. That is correct. We have a CI at the ASF. The nightly

Re: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

2008-08-07 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefano Bagnara wrote: The current process is a simple nighly build [that] is good for the nighlies, but I

RE: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

2008-08-06 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Stefano Bagnara wrote: The current process is a simple nighly build [that] is good for the nighlies, but I think I don't have to explain the difference between a real CI environment and a nighly build script. That is correct. We have a CI at the ASF. The nightly wasn't intended to replace

Re: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

2008-08-06 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefano Bagnara wrote: The current process is a simple nighly build [that] is good for the nighlies, but I think I don't have to explain the difference between a real CI environment and a nighly build script. That is

Re: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

2008-07-25 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 7/25/08, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the current Nightly Build stuff is under control of Noel and we have no way to tune or make better investigations there. Yes, and I am happy to provide that service to the greater JAMES community. Was there a Thank You in there somewhere

Re: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

2008-07-25 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: the current Nightly Build stuff is under control of Noel and we have no way to tune or make better investigations there. Yes, and I am happy to provide that service to the greater JAMES community. Was there a Thank You in there somewhere, or just your usual

Re: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

2008-07-25 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: We've talked about having a JAMES zone for testing. Of course, you were against it the last time, apparently for the sole reason that I suggested it. I love markmail: http://markmail.org/message/ovr6engrmoqegdnh It was 2008, May the 2nd, and you was proposing

Re: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

2008-07-24 Thread Norman Maurer
Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:04 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: JAMES Nightly Build System ha scritto: An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/ Any unit

RE: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

2008-07-24 Thread Noel J. Bergman
the current Nightly Build stuff is under control of Noel and we have no way to tune or make better investigations there. Yes, and I am happy to provide that service to the greater JAMES community. Was there a Thank You in there somewhere, or just your usual complaining behavior? We don't

RE: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

2008-07-24 Thread Norman Maurer
Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 22:33 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman: the current Nightly Build stuff is under control of Noel and we have no way to tune or make better investigations there. Yes, and I am happy to provide that service to the greater JAMES community. Was there a Thank You