Re: [handlerapi-experiment] Adding HookResultHook

2007-01-05 Thread Norman Maurer
Stefano Bagnara schrieb: > Norman Maurer wrote: >> Stefano Bagnara schrieb: >>> We should probably move logging of ok/deny operations from specific >>> hooks to this Hook result interceptor. >> This sound like a good idea, but i have to think a bit more about >> this .. > > The first that open the

Re: [handlerapi-experiment] Adding HookResultHook

2007-01-04 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Norman Maurer wrote: Stefano Bagnara schrieb: We should probably move logging of ok/deny operations from specific hooks to this Hook result interceptor. This sound like a good idea, but i have to think a bit more about this .. The first that open the workspace should add this to TODO so we re

Re: [handlerapi-experiment] Adding HookResultHook

2007-01-03 Thread Norman Maurer
Stefano Bagnara schrieb: > Norman Maurer wrote: >> I add a HookResultHook which let developers hook in directly after each >> Hook return the HookResult... I used this hook now to let the >> JunkScoreHandler work again. This also give developers the possibilty >> to do generic stuff on DENY, OK (F

Re: [handlerapi-experiment] Adding HookResultHook

2007-01-03 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Norman Maurer wrote: I add a HookResultHook which let developers hook in directly after each Hook return the HookResult... I used this hook now to let the JunkScoreHandler work again. This also give developers the possibilty to do generic stuff on DENY, OK (For example accounting) etc. I had n