David Jencks ha scritto:
On Jun 29, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start of
the Geronimo project. Two fairly recent developments in JAMES have
now made this a relatively simple task: the maven b
On Jun 29, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start
of the Geronimo project. Two fairly recent developments in JAMES
have now made this a relatively simple task: the maven build and
the spring in
David Jencks ha scritto:
I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start of the
Geronimo project. Two fairly recent developments in JAMES have now made
this a relatively simple task: the maven build and the spring
integration code.
- the maven build enables painless connec
Am Sonntag, den 22.06.2008, 08:54 +0100 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > David Jencks ha scritto:
> >>
> >> On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> >>>
> >>> David Jencks ha scritto:
> >>> At the moment th
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> JAMES is too hard to understand and that's why i think we need to pull
> out the protocols (smtp, nntp, pop3, imap) into independent,
> embeddable libraries with no coupling to avalon (or to the JAMES
> socket han
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Jencks ha scritto:
>>
>> On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>>
>>> David Jencks ha scritto:
>>> At the moment the geronimo-james integration is simply a single gbean for
>>> the whole james applica
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:10 AM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 16, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>
>> David Jencks ha scritto:
>>>
>>> On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
At the moment the geronimo-james integr
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
Another issue I came across is use of com.sun mail classes (I
started by trying to use the geronimo mail provider before I
understood why the stage repo wasn't working
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
rewriting the JAMES spool using JMS would be good
Why?
specifically: restarting my JAMES instance every couple of days has
started to irritate
Do you think t
On Jun 16, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
At the moment the geronimo-james integration is simply a single
gbean for the whole james application: do you think it would be
hard t
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>
>> David Jencks ha scritto:
>>>
>>> On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
>
> Another issue I came across is use of com.sun mail classes (I s
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
Another issue I came across is use of com.sun mail classes (I
started by trying to use the geronimo mail provider before I
understood why the stage repo wasn't working
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
generally: we've talked before and the whole design a
David Jencks ha scritto:
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
Another issue I came across is use of com.sun mail classes (I started
by trying to use the geronimo mail provider before I understood why
the stage repo wasn't working for me). Is this intent
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
generally: we've talked before and the whole design around that area
of the system could be so much better
technology: actually support for any distri
David Jencks ha scritto:
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
At the moment the geronimo-james integration is simply a single gbean
for the whole james application: do you think it would be hard to
support 1 gbean per function? JAMES is composed by api m
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
rewriting the JAMES spool using JMS would be good
>>>
>>> Why?
>>
>> specifically: restarting m
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
David Jencks ha scritto:
I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start
of the Geronimo project. Two fairly recent developments in JAMES
have now made this a relatively simple task: the maven build and
the spring int
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
rewriting the JAMES spool using JMS would be good
Why?
specifically: restarting my JAMES instance every couple of days has
started to irritate
Do you think that the current spoolrep
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> rewriting the JAMES spool using JMS would be good
>
> Why?
specifically: restarting my JAMES instance every couple of days has
started to irritate
generally: we've talked before and the whole design around that area
of
David Jencks ha scritto:
I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start of the
Geronimo project. Two fairly recent developments in JAMES have now made
this a relatively simple task: the maven build and the spring
integration code.
[...]
Instructions:
1. Apply patches for
> rewriting the JAMES spool using JMS would be good
Why?
You do realize that rewriting the spool for JMS actually means introducing a
spool broker service, right?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Jencks wrote:
>> ---
>>
>> Future directions
>>
>> Currently there is minimal integration between geronimo and JAMES. One
>> really obvious integration point would be to use ger
David Jencks wrote:
I've put the james config files in a geronimo-standard location of
var/james/config. I changed the ports so the server would start without
superuser permissions. So far I just know the server starts without
errors: I haven't figure out how to test if it can actually do any
David Jencks wrote:
I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start of the
Geronimo project. Two fairly recent developments in JAMES have now made
this a relatively simple task: the maven build and the spring
integration code.
Me too. :-)
It was one of the major motivatio
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 7:31 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been hoping for a Geronimo-JAMES integration since the start of the
> Geronimo project.
cool
i have as well but not quite that long ;-)
> Two fairly recent developments in JAMES have now made
> this a relatively simp
26 matches
Mail list logo
