On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> James app had many artifacts not referred in the NOTICE/LICENSE: from
> a fast review it seems jSPF includes them. Can you be more specific
> (maybe adding a comment to the JIRA issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-91 )?
I
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Please note that tester\src\main\resources\META-INF\NOTICE includes
> specific statements (also copied in the /NOTICE.txt) about third party
> files bundled in the source tree (so this is a bit different from
> other james projects and m
2011/7/11 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>> 2011/7/11 Robert Burrell Donkin :
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
What's the problem with its LICENSE/NOTICE? (IIRC we agreed that was
OK to use a single LICENSE/NO
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> 2011/7/11 Robert Burrell Donkin :
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>> What's the problem with its LICENSE/NOTICE? (IIRC we agreed that was
>>> OK to use a single LICENSE/NOTICE tuple in this case because even the
2011/7/11 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>> What's the problem with its LICENSE/NOTICE? (IIRC we agreed that was
>> OK to use a single LICENSE/NOTICE tuple in this case because even the
>> source distro has non-ALv2 contents to be declared and pro
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> 2011/7/10 Robert Burrell Donkin :
>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> The LICENSE and NOTICE stuff in the source and binary releases isn't
>>> great but probably isn't harmful. Needs to be addr
2011/7/10 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> The LICENSE and NOTICE stuff in the source and binary releases isn't
>> great but probably isn't harmful. Needs to be addressed before the
>> next release.
>
> Now is perhaps a good time t
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> The LICENSE and NOTICE stuff in the source and binary releases isn't
> great but probably isn't harmful. Needs to be addressed before the
> next release.
Now is perhaps a good time to ask ourselves whether we should continue
to sh
Ok I will prepare the release this evening.
Bye,
Norman
2011/7/4 Stefano Bagnara :
> 2011/7/4 Norman Maurer :
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I did some fixing of the OSGI metadata in jspf. I would like to cut a
>> new release for this. Its a small change so not sure about the version
>> numbering.
>>
>> Las
2011/7/4 Norman Maurer :
> Hi there,
>
> I did some fixing of the OSGI metadata in jspf. I would like to cut a
> new release for this. Its a small change so not sure about the version
> numbering.
>
> Last release was 0.9.8. So what now: 0.9.9 or 0.9.8.1 ?
I'm for 0.9.9 or ... 1.0 as after years I
Hi there,
I did some fixing of the OSGI metadata in jspf. I would like to cut a
new release for this. Its a small change so not sure about the version
numbering.
Last release was 0.9.8. So what now: 0.9.9 or 0.9.8.1 ?
Changes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&
On Feb 15, 2008 12:51 PM, Bernd Fondermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1, go ahead
sounds good :-)
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1, go ahead
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I whould like to push a new jspf release the next week. Anyone against
> this ? If noone will raise his voice i will prepare all needed steps +
> vote..
&
Norman Maurer ha scritto:
Hi all,
I whould like to push a new jspf release the next week. Anyone against
this ? If noone will raise his voice i will prepare all needed steps +
vote..
Cheers,
Norman
Welcome back Norman :-)
I'm happy to hear you pushing a new jSPF release! I think every
Hi all,
I whould like to push a new jspf release the next week. Anyone against
this ? If noone will raise his voice i will prepare all needed steps +
vote..
Cheers,
Norman
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Anyone had a look yet ? I whould really like to push it forward ;-)
Can you sign the release Noel ?
bye
Norman
Am Dienstag, den 06.06.2006, 18:02 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> I just built jspf on minotaur (published on people.apache.org)
> /~bago/jspf/1.0b1/
>
> You can download the library
I just built jspf on minotaur (published on people.apache.org)
/~bago/jspf/1.0b1/
You can download the library jar and look at the generated website.
We should deploy the generated website at james.apache.org/jspf when we
vote for the next release.
Stefano
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi guys,
I
Hi guys,
I think Stefano and me complete the main work to release the first beta
version of jspf (1.0b1) The Site generation is done by maven2. Cause
Stefano and me are not signed yet some other most sign the release
(maybe Noel).
What you guys think? When and where we can upload the sites ? I re
18 matches
Mail list logo
