BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'james/ApacheJames/master [master] [1255]':
Check console output at "https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/james/job/ApacheJames/job/master/1255/;>james/ApacheJames/master
[master] [1255]"
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
BUILD-STABLE: Job 'james/ApacheJames/master [master] [1254]':
Is back to normal.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
+1
Correct artifact: #1081:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-1081/
Note that version is in the comment section on Nexus.
On 12/02/2024 11:37, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
Hi,
Taking into account the feedback of this very list,
I would like to propose a new vote for
+1
On 12/02/2024 11:46, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
Hi,
Following the feedback of this very list,
I would like to propose a new vote for 3.8.1 release of the Apache
James server.
You can find:
- The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
#1080:
+1
On 12/02/2024 11:35, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.10 release of the Apache
MIME4J library.
You can find:
- The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
#1076:
Author: btellier
Date: Mon Feb 12 10:05:25 2024
New Revision: 67291
Log:
Archive 3.6.2
Removed:
release/james/server/3.6.2/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi all,
The following vote failed to achieved quorum, 4 positive votes having
been expressed, 1 of them being binding.
I will re-trigger a vote.
Best regards,
Benoit TELLIER
On 08/01/2024 15:36, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.10 release of the Apache
Hi,
Taking into account the feedback of this very list,
I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.5 release of the Apache James
server.
You can find:
- The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
#1079:
Hi,
I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.10 release of the Apache
MIME4J library.
You can find:
- The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
#1076:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-1076/
- The changelog:
Author: btellier
Date: Mon Feb 12 10:27:11 2024
New Revision: 67293
Log:
Apache James 3.7.5 Release candidate materials
Added:
release/james/server/3.7.5/
release/james/server/3.7.5/.sha512
release/james/server/3.7.5/james-project-3.7.5-source-release.zip (with
props)
Typo
The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact #1081:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-1081/
On 12/02/2024 11:35, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.10 release of the Apache
MIME4J library.
You can
Author: btellier
Date: Mon Feb 12 10:44:54 2024
New Revision: 67295
Log:
Refresh James 3.8.1 for new RC
Added:
release/james/server/3.8.1/james-project-3.8.1-source-release.zip (with
props)
release/james/server/3.8.1/james-project-3.8.1-source-release.zip.asc
(with props)
Hi,
Following the feedback of this very list,
I would like to propose a new vote for 3.8.1 release of the Apache James
server.
You can find:
- The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
#1080:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-1080/
Hello Otto.
Very good question, thanks for asking!
You can perfectly use Cassandra 4 with James 3.8.x, it actually work great.
Cassandra 3 and Cassandra 4 are mostly similar. Some mild differences
can be noticed in some table settings (some compaction strategies
present in Cassandra 4 are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benoit Tellier closed JAMES-3988.
-
Resolution: Invalid
This is a user question and shall be asked on the mailing list.
For the
Hi all,
I just noticed that the James master branch uses the Cassandra 4 docker
image, while the 3.8.x branch still uses Cassandra 3. I was wondering,
can I use Cassandra 4 with 3.8.x as well, or is there a reason why I
should not do this?
Cheers,
Karsten OTTO
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
+1
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
Karsten OTTO
On 12.02.24 11:37 AM, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
Hi,
Taking into account the feedback of this very list,
I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.5 release of the Apache James
server.
You can find:
- The maven release staged in
+1
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
Karsten OTTO
On 12.02.24 11:46 AM, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
Hi,
Following the feedback of this very list,
I would like to propose a new vote for 3.8.1 release of the Apache James
server.
You can find:
- The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the
mohan created JAMES-3988:
Summary: How can we create the daily logs for James server and how
to maintain james.log daily bases? How to manage/housekeep the logs created
in var/mail/error folder?
Key: JAMES-3988
URL:
mohan created JAMES-3989:
Summary: Health check has to be implemented for James server ? How?
Key: JAMES-3989
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3989
Project: James Server
Issue Type:
Hi everyone,
I would like to formalize a bit better this vote
(thanks Quan for proposing it.)
- Voting starts from 06/02/2024 (in order to take into account initial
feedback on Quan mail)
- And ends on 16/02/2024 (4 days)
This is a lazy consensus.
This vote may be vetoed (vetos shall be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benoit Tellier closed JAMES-3987.
-
Resolution: Invalid
Questions should be asked and will be answered on the mailing list.
CF
mohan created JAMES-3987:
Summary: Failed emails are stored in error folder->how to retry?
what is the configuration to implement Retry?
Key: JAMES-3987
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3987
23 matches
Mail list logo
