On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 03:23:45PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
The main challenge with using Debian or something besides Fedora is that
you would have to install and support the code separately.
This may be an acceptable cost given the high Debian packaging
experience within the volunteer base
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:36 PM, James Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 03:23:45PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
The main challenge with using Debian or something besides Fedora is that
you would have to install and support the code separately.
This may be an acceptable
Pia Waugh wrote:
Hi all,
I have a few projects I am helping support and was thinking about doing an
Ubuntu based XS option. I wanted to find out whether anyone else was
interested in this, and whether any work has been done. My reason for
wanting to do an Ubuntu version is purely because it
You can count me in on that... I've been pushing for debian or ubuntu
to be the XS platform for a while, and I know Martin Langhoff sort of
feels the same way... but since so much work has already been done on
Fedora, we should see how feasable it is to make 2 concurrent XS
rollouts... but yeah
Hi all,
One more argument for a debian based XS: Debian supports various non-x86
architectures, which are good candidates for a compact, affordable, and low
power XS server:
- The mipsel based fuloong mini ( http://www.lemote.com/english/fuloong.html )
engineered by the chinese Jiangsu Lemote
Hi all
For the porting efforts people can begin packaging the different software
tools, provided by the XS, without waiting for all the OS support.
For example the upgrade server was originally developed for debian.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Upgrade_server
Just a though. :).
On Sun, Aug 17,
Hi all,
Firstly thanks for all the feedback. I want to ensure everyone knows this
isn't about undermining the great work already done on Fedora, but rather it
about I guess scratching an itch that a few people have. I think that where
possible we post the existing XS packages so that people can
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 07:41:13AM +1000, Pia Waugh wrote:
There are a few interesting feature requests I've had from local trials,
including the ability to only allow an XS to talk to approved XOs, to
avoid strangers parking outside a school with an XO and interacting with
children (worst case
Hi Michael,
quote who=Michael Stone
Uruguay already uses a Debian-basex XS (which is quite different from
Martin's) and which includes some MAC-address filtering technology.
(They've also expressed great interest in expanding this technology into
a full 802.11i/802.1x/EAP/RADIUS
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
off the top of my head:
Additional notes on this
- idmgr needs a rewrite, badly
- xs-cong is undergoing a big change
- libpam-sotp needs a security audit
there are more details in the bugtracker. And if anyone wants
Would be interesting to know more on Uruguay's Debian based XS.. any links?
Besides, if I remember correctly, I guess Tony Pearson was also part of
that team or maybe not. I have mixed feelings about the current XS
builds, guess I'd have preferred the XS being a lot more efficient and
to run
11 matches
Mail list logo
