On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> As you've seen - getting this old version to build is difficult.
> Getting it to run is even harder.
Yep. Was just a stab in the alternative path. Now that you've
root-cause'd the issue, things look better.
> I think I've found the issue: it
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Ok. Following the breadcrumbe here, I get to
> https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-919 which has a nice patch
> authored by the Geoff Cant, a fellow Catalyst-er. I can help w a
> rebuild here.
As you've seen - getting this old versi
On Feb 8, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the XS rebase to CentOS6.2, EPEL-6 brought us ejabberd-2.1.8.
> We found an issue that the Online group cannot be marked as @online@
> correctly. Upgrading to ejabberd-2.1.10 (from EPEL6-testing) fixes
> this.
>
> However, there is
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> With the XS rebase to CentOS6.2, EPEL-6 brought us ejabberd-2.1.8.
> We found an issue that the Online group cannot be marked as @online@
> correctly. Upgrading to ejabberd-2.1.10 (from EPEL6-testing) fixes
> this.
That's good news. As I menti
Hi,
With the XS rebase to CentOS6.2, EPEL-6 brought us ejabberd-2.1.8.
We found an issue that the Online group cannot be marked as @online@
correctly. Upgrading to ejabberd-2.1.10 (from EPEL6-testing) fixes
this.
However, there is a regression with collaboration: presence doesn't work right.
I t
