Benoit,
Thanks for the info. Kinda what I was suspecting. Here's what I've
done so far...
My ultimate objective is to maintain a searchable index for all of the
hundreds of thousands of emails stored in my JAMES mail db. As
previously discussed, this is only possible assuming I have a
Hi All,
I am getting the following error in one of our James installations. This
is not related to File repository. I checked the source. This is being
thrown from MimeMessageInputStreamSource where it tries to create a temp
file. Increasing the ulimit will solve the problem ? Please provide
Hello Jerry,
just a few thoughts about alternatives (not sure I got your problem).
Why don't use a database sequence field or AUTO_INCREMENT field, instead of a
UUID? And let the database handle the UUID creation?
But if you would like to use UUIDs: Make sure it is not part of a race
Sorry,
Thought about again:
I think using a sequence is wrong. Cause Thunderbird makes a COPY, you will
get a new UUID for the B:42 mail, and as I understand that is not what you
need.
Greetings
Bernd
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bernd Waibel [mailto:bwai...@intarsys.de]
This is somewhat an IMAP question. But also a JAMES implementation
question. My client has a massive amount of mail that must be kept and
accessed. They use Thunderbird and Outlook to do the normal mail
handling stuff. No problems at all on the client side. But on the back
end, I need to
Hello Jerry,
a very good question. I would like to tell my opinion, not sure if I could
help.
We use James v2.3.2. We currently do not use the mailboxes, but anyway. We
develop with James.
Some time ago we moved our old mail system (postfix based) to a new mail system
(MS Exchange).
Because
Hi Jerry,
You are right ... This is what happens when you drag and drop an e-mail
in thunderbid from folder A to B :
1 : Client receive a mail in folder A . The mail is identified by the
pair ( mailbox path + uid ). Mailbox path ( or mailbox Id ) is folder
specific. Uid is a long, per mailbox
Le 13/03/2015 17:36, Bernd Waibel a écrit :
I am not firm with IMAP, is there a move operation?
If the move operation is implemented as a delete and create operation,
the identity will be lost.
Is it possible to implement the move operation as a database renaming
operation, to keep the
