The “Learn more” link from GMAIL leads to this page :
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6330403?visit_id=637757678589778136-970944847=tls=en=1#zippy=%2Cwhy-some-emails-might-not-be-encrypted
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 2:04 PM Bs Serge wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> After configuring Reverse DNS PTR
My whole conf dir is "stock" except for the key passphrase's. The only
change I made was the one I did below (which comments it should be that
way anyway.) And yes, I tried all combinations of being auth'd and not
or TLS and not. Unless I'm reading it wrong (quite likely) it was
treating my
outgoing
5000, 10, 23*50
25
0
10 true
bounces true
true false
${env:OP_JAMES_REMOTE_DELIVERY_HELO}
(sample taken from mailetcontainer.xml of one of my environments.)
The important thing here is startTLS true as it enable opportunistic
connection upgrades.
Your very next problem is
Thank you Benoit,
Guice sounds good,
But Is there a Guice binary distribution that does not require build, that
is straightforward like the spring binary distribution zip without needing
Docker to compile it?
Best Regards,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 3:23 AM btell...@apache.org
wrote:
>
> On
Hi again,
After configuring Reverse DNS PTR record, SPF, DKIM and DMARC, emails I
send are now out of spam and inside the inbox (of GMAIL, ...)
But they are still marked as unencrypted as you can see here:
https://ibb.co/FsLF6Lr
Even though I configured STARTTLS and generated an SSL certificate
Hello Serge.
On 22/12/2021 16:09, Bs Serge wrote:
> Thank you Benoit,
>
> Guice sounds good,
>
> But Is there a Guice binary distribution that does not require build, that
> is straightforward like the spring binary distribution zip without needing
> Docker to compile it?
That's the point!
Gosshh I wish I could do that because I don't want to use Docker.
Best regards,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:22 PM btell...@apache.org
wrote:
> Hello Serge.
>
> On 22/12/2021 16:09, Bs Serge wrote:
> > Thank you Benoit,
> >
> > Guice sounds good,
> >
> > But Is there a Guice binary distribution
