Re: RFR: 7152800: All tests using the attach API fail with "well-known file is not secure" on Mac OS X

2012-03-19 Thread Dmitry Samersoff
Dean, In all cases it is good to set required mode/owner explicitly. PS: RESTARTABLE is not necessary around chmod & chown as neither of them could be interrupted. -Dmitry On 2012-03-19 23:38, Dean Long wrote: > On linux, you can control this behavior with the setgid mode bit on the > parent d

hg: hsx/hotspot-rt/hotspot: 7141246: build-infra merge: Introduce new JVM_VARIANT* to control which kind of jvm gets built

2012-03-19 Thread david . holmes
Changeset: 3d7ea1dbe0de Author:erikj Date: 2012-03-19 10:09 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/3d7ea1dbe0de 7141246: build-infra merge: Introduce new JVM_VARIANT* to control which kind of jvm gets built Reviewed-by: dholmes, ohair ! make/Makefile ! ma

Re: RFR: 7152800: All tests using the attach API fail with "well-known file is not secure" on Mac OS X

2012-03-19 Thread Dean Long
On linux, you can control this behavior with the setgid mode bit on the parent directory. Does that also work on OSX? dl On 3/19/2012 6:03 AM, Staffan Larsen wrote: Please review the following fix: Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/7152800/webrev.00/

hg: hsx/hotspot-rt/langtools: 14 new changesets

2012-03-19 Thread john . coomes
Changeset: 161230ec7c73 Author:mcimadamore Date: 2012-03-02 12:57 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/langtools/rev/161230ec7c73 7132880: Resolve should support nested resolution contexts Summary: Overload resolution routine should be updated so that it can be calle

hg: hsx/hotspot-rt/hotspot: 7152800: All tests using the attach API fail with "well-known file is not secure" on Mac OS X

2012-03-19 Thread staffan . larsen
Changeset: 77591ef8983a Author:sla Date: 2012-03-19 20:13 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/77591ef8983a 7152800: All tests using the attach API fail with "well-known file is not secure" on Mac OS X Summary: Create well-known file with effective group

Re: RFR: 7152800: All tests using the attach API fail with "well-known file is not secure" on Mac OS X

2012-03-19 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
On 3/19/12 7:03 AM, Staffan Larsen wrote: Please review the following fix: Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/7152800/webrev.00/ Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7152800 Thumbs up! src/os/bsd/vm/attachListene

Re: RFR: 7152800: All tests using the attach API fail with "well-known file is not secure" on Mac OS X

2012-03-19 Thread Keith McGuigan
Looks good! -- - Keith On 3/19/2012 9:03 AM, Staffan Larsen wrote: Please review the following fix: Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/7152800/webrev.00/ Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7152800 We sometimes get an error say "well-known file is not secure" when ru

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 7152798: TEST_BUG: sun/management/HotspotClassLoadingMBean/GetClassLoadingTime.java does not compile

2012-03-19 Thread staffan . larsen
Changeset: 3b50a4971a1a Author:sla Date: 2012-03-19 14:18 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/3b50a4971a1a 7152798: TEST_BUG: sun/management/HotspotClassLoadingMBean/GetClassLoadingTime.java does not compile Summary: Make sure the test is compiled, run and finds

RFR: 7152800: All tests using the attach API fail with "well-known file is not secure" on Mac OS X

2012-03-19 Thread Staffan Larsen
Please review the following fix: Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/7152800/webrev.00/ Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7152800 We sometimes get an error say "well-known file is not secure" when running attach-tests on mac osx. The reason is a difference in how files

Re: RFR: 7154113: jcmd, jps and jstat tests failing when there are unknown Java processes on the system

2012-03-19 Thread Alan Bateman
On 19/03/2012 07:34, Staffan Larsen wrote: On 17 mar 2012, at 23:47, David Holmes wrote: On 16/03/2012 6:10 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote: Fixes have been verified in JPRT. How have the fixes been "verified" in JPRT? We would expect these tests to pass in JPRT, where there should be no unknown Jav

Re: RFR: 7154113: jcmd, jps and jstat tests failing when there are unknown Java processes on the system

2012-03-19 Thread Staffan Larsen
On 17 mar 2012, at 23:47, David Holmes wrote: > On 16/03/2012 6:10 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote: >> Fixes have been verified in JPRT. > > How have the fixes been "verified" in JPRT? We would expect these tests to > pass in JPRT, where there should be no unknown Java processes. So how have we > verif