> On Dec 7, 2015, at 7:42 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>
> On 8/12/2015 1:54 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Hi Jaroslav,
>>
>> Is this just to accommodate the test library? I found no other
>> references in java.base.
>>
>> If so, then perhaps it can be placed in another package that the tests
>> routi
On 8/12/2015 1:54 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Jaroslav,
Is this just to accommodate the test library? I found no other
references in java.base.
If so, then perhaps it can be placed in another package that the tests
routinely need access to.
Does this fit the scope of the WhiteBox?
The original
On 8/12/2015 6:54 AM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Jaroslav,
Looks good.
Would it more clean with the "volatile" keyword ?
45 public static boolean active = true;
If set and read in different threads then it must be volatile. Else C2
can turn it into an if-check outside an infinite l
Hi Cheleswer,
Thanks. Just a few minor updates ...
On 3/12/2015 4:58 PM, cheleswer sahu wrote:
Hi,
Thanks David and Staffan for your comments. Please review the code
changes in the updated webrev below
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kevinw/8138745/webrev.01/
src/share/vm/runtime/globals.hpp
As
Hi Jaroslav,
Looks good.
Would it more clean with the "volatile" keyword ?
45 public static boolean active = true;
Thanks,
Serguei
On 12/7/15 00:43, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 1.12.2015 18:33, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following simple test change
Issue : https://bugs.op
Thanks Staffan!
Marcus
On 2015-12-07 15:43, Staffan Larsen wrote:
Looks good!
Thanks,
/Staffan
On 4 dec. 2015, at 15:46, Marcus Larsson wrote:
Hi,
Please review the following patch to allow C++ reserved keywords to be used as
UL tags. This allows usage of a 'class' tag, for example.
Tag
Hi Jaroslav,
Is this just to accommodate the test library? I found no other
references in java.base.
If so, then perhaps it can be placed in another package that the tests
routinely need access to.
Does this fit the scope of the WhiteBox?
Thanks, Roger
On 12/07/2015 06:23 AM, Jaroslav B
Looks good!
Thanks,
/Staffan
> On 4 dec. 2015, at 15:46, Marcus Larsson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please review the following patch to allow C++ reserved keywords to be used
> as UL tags. This allows usage of a 'class' tag, for example.
>
> Tags are now automatically prefixed with underscores by th
On 2015-12-07 12:16, David Holmes wrote:
On 7/12/2015 5:58 PM, Marcus Larsson wrote:
Hi David,
On 2015-12-07 07:26, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Marcus,
On 5/12/2015 12:46 AM, Marcus Larsson wrote:
Hi,
Please review the following patch to allow C++ reserved keywords to be
used as UL tags. This
On 7.12.2015 12:20, David Holmes wrote:
On 7/12/2015 6:46 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
> On 27.11.2015 13:21, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>> On 26.11.2015 12:59, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>>> On 26.11.2015 12:48, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 25.11.2015 04:11, Mandy Chung wrote:
>
> > On N
On 7/12/2015 6:46 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 27.11.2015 13:21, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 26.11.2015 12:59, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 26.11.2015 12:48, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 25.11.2015 04:11, Mandy Chung wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 6:24 PM, David Holmes
wrote:
>
> On 25/11/20
On 7/12/2015 5:58 PM, Marcus Larsson wrote:
Hi David,
On 2015-12-07 07:26, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Marcus,
On 5/12/2015 12:46 AM, Marcus Larsson wrote:
Hi,
Please review the following patch to allow C++ reserved keywords to be
used as UL tags. This allows usage of a 'class' tag, for example.
Looks good!
Thanks,
/Staffan
> On 1 dec. 2015, at 18:33, Jaroslav Bachorik
> wrote:
>
> Please, review the following simple test change
>
> Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144308
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8144308/webrev.00
>
> The test keeps the debugg
On 27.11.2015 13:21, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 26.11.2015 12:59, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 26.11.2015 12:48, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 25.11.2015 04:11, Mandy Chung wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 6:24 PM, David Holmes
wrote:
>
> On 25/11/2015 10:06 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 24
On 1.12.2015 18:33, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following simple test change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144308
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8144308/webrev.00
The test keeps the debuggee spinning in a loop and does not stop it once
the test
15 matches
Mail list logo
