Hi Daniel,
On Tuesday 20 June 2017 06:39 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 20/06/2017 12:42, Ujwal Vangapally wrote:
Thanks for the Review Daniel, Harsha.
Yes with this fix JConsole running on JDK 8 won't be able to connect
to a process running on higher version of Java containing this change.
I
On 20/06/2017 12:42, Ujwal Vangapally wrote:
Thanks for the Review Daniel, Harsha.
Yes with this fix JConsole running on JDK 8 won't be able to connect to
a process running on higher version of Java containing this change.
I think even Harsha is agreeing this, his point is that the use case
Hi,
I would expect to see a mix of versions in many operational cases. For
example, in a large
deployment there will be a mix of versions active and the folks
monitoring it should not
have to change their management tools unnecessarily.
The usual rule for interoperability between versions is
Thanks for the Review Daniel, Harsha.
Yes with this fix JConsole running on JDK 8 won't be able to connect to
a process running on higher version of Java containing this change.
I think even Harsha is agreeing this, his point is that the use case
where a client running on JDK 8 trying to
Hi Harsha,
Maybe I'm missing something.
How is the local agent started?
If it's started when you connect jconsole to a process
by specifying the process ID - then I suspect this will
prevent e.g. jconsole or jvisualvm running on JDK 8 to
connect to your process.
Can you verify that it's not
Hi Daniel,
The fix is applicable only to local JMX agent and the most common use
case would be client and server running from same JVM.
It is highly unlikely that local JMX agent will be started to cater for
out-of-jvm clients.
I don't see how introducing this fix can cause new
Hi,
If I'm not mistaken then this will make it impossible
for earlier release to interoperate with newer releases
as the LocalRMIClientSocketFactory class will not be
present the client tries to deserialize the stub.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 19/06/2017 11:52, Ujwal Vangapally wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Kindly review the fix for bug below
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173180
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~uvangapally/webrev/2017/8173180/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Ujwal
