Hi Gary,
It looks good to me.
Nit:
It is better to define as interface:
+private static RemoteHostImpl remoteHost;
=>
+private static RemoteHost remoteHost;
+private static RemoteVmImpl rvm;
=>
+private static Re
Here's an updated webrev that includes the change to bind to the stub.
The jstatd tests continue to pass after this change.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gadams/8203026/webrev.01/
It would be good to have a second reviewer from the serviceability team.
Longer term it would be good to rep
Hi Gary,
Holding a static reference to the implementation solves the problem.
But I noticed that the object that is bound in the registry is the
RemoteHostImpl
and it should be the RemoteHost stub.
Line 145: should be:
bind(name.toString(), stub);
That is likely to solve the problem
