RE: RFR: 8180514: TestPrintMdo.java test fails with -XX:-TieredCompilation

2020-10-01 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Jesper, Thanks for opening that issue, if this is implemented it will help a lot! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Jesper Wilhelmsson > Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 11:35 PM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: Leonid Mesnik ; serv

RE: RFR: 8180514: TestPrintMdo.java test fails with -XX:-TieredCompilation

2020-10-01 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, Please open up a dummy copy JBS issue without confidential information if you fix a closed, internal Oracle bug. I missed this before, I only saw it is closed when this was pushed today. It is really annoying to still see closed bugs. I had hoped skara would help to avoid this. Please find

RE: RFR: 8252837: Cleanup SAP Copyright file headers

2020-09-06 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Christoph, Looks good to me 😊 Best regards, Goetz. -Original Message- From: nio-dev On Behalf Of Christoph Langer Sent: Montag, 7. September 2020 06:22 To: hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net; net-...@openjdk.java.net; nio-...@openjdk.java.net; serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net Subjec

RE: RFR(L) 8227745: Enable Escape Analysis for Better Performance in the Presence of JVMTI Agents

2020-08-27 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Richard, Thanks for the new webrev. The small improvements are fine, too. Reviewed from my side. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Reingruber, Richard > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 10:33 PM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; serviceability- > d...@o

RE: RFR(L) 8227745: Enable Escape Analysis for Better Performance in the Presence of JVMTI Agents

2020-08-21 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
rev needed) Best regards, Goetz. -Original Message- From: Reingruber, Richard Sent: Dienstag, 18. August 2020 10:44 To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net; hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net; hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net Subject: RE: RFR(L) 82277

RE: RFR(L) 8227745: Enable Escape Analysis for Better Performance in the Presence of JVMTI Agents

2020-07-23 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Richard, Thanks for your two further explanations in the other thread. That made the points clear to me. > > I was not that happy with the names saying not_global_escape > > and similar. I now agreed you have to use the terms of the escape > > analysis (NoEscape ArgEscape= throughout the run

RE: RFR(L) 8227745: Enable Escape Analysis for Better Performance in the Presence of JVMTI Agents

2020-07-22 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Richard, Thanks for the quick reply. > > > With DeoptimizeObjectsALot enabled internal threads are started that > > > deoptimize frames and > > > objects. The number of threads started are given with > > > DeoptimizeObjectsALotThreadCountAll and > > > DeoptimizeObjectsALotThreadCountSing

RE: RFR(L) 8227745: Enable Escape Analysis for Better Performance in the Presence of JVMTI Agents

2020-07-17 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Richard, > I'll answer to the obvious things in this mail now. > I'll go through the code thoroughly again and write > a review of my findings thereafter. As promised a detailed walk-throug, but without any major findings: c1_IR.hpp: ok ci_Env.h|cpp: ok compiledMethod.cpp, nmethod.cpp: ok debu

RE: RFR(L) 8227745: Enable Escape Analysis for Better Performance in the Presence of JVMTI Agents

2020-07-16 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Richard, I'll answer to the obvious things in this mail now. I'll go through the code thoroughly again and write a review of my findings thereafter. > So here is the new webrev.6 > > Webrev.6: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rrich/webrevs/2019/8227745/webrev.6/ > Delta: > http://cr.openjdk.ja

RE: RFR(L) 8237354: Add option to jcmd to write a gzipped heap dump

2020-06-08 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
HI Ralf, Thanks for the info. Looks good, in my eyes ready to be pushed. Best regards, Goetz. -Original Message- From: Schmelter, Ralf Sent: Montag, 8. Juni 2020 11:38 To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Langer, Christoph Cc: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net; hotspot-runtime

RE: RFR(L) 8237354: Add option to jcmd to write a gzipped heap dump

2020-06-05 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
d the relative poor performance of > deflate() ensures that at least 5 to 10 threads will probably always > be active ;) Ok, thanks. Best regards, Goetz. From: Lindenmaier, Goetz <mailto:goetz.lindenma...@sap.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 3

RE: RFR(L) 8237354: Add option to jcmd to write a gzipped heap dump

2020-06-03 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Ralf, I had a look at your change, webrev.3. Thanks for contributing this! Overall, a nicely engineered piece of work. Thus, my comments are mostly minor details: diagnosticCommand.hpp ok. diagnosticCommand.cpp: l.510 I would be a bit more precise in the comment: ..."9 the slowest level

RE: RFR(L) 8227745: Enable Escape Analysis for Better Performance in the Presence of JVMTI Agents

2020-05-06 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
rtin 😊) Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Reingruber, Richard > Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 8:15 AM > To: Doerr, Martin ; 'Robbin Ehn' > ; Lindenmaier, Goetz > ; David Holmes ; > Vladimir Kozlov (vladimir.koz...@oracle.com)

RE: RFR(L) 8227745: Enable Escape Analysis for Better Performance in the Presence of JVMTI Agents

2020-02-24 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, I had a look at the progress of this change. Nothing happened since Richard posted his update using more handshakes [1]. But we (SAP) would appreciate a lot if this change could be successfully reviewed and pushed. I think there is basic understanding that this change is helpful. It fixes a

RE: RFR: 8233784: ProblemList failing JVMTI scenario tests

2019-11-07 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi David, thanks for adding our failures. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: David Holmes > Sent: Donnerstag, 7. November 2019 13:24 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; serviceability-dev > ; hotspot-runtime- > d...@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: RFR:

RE: RFR: 8233784: ProblemList failing JVMTI scenario tests

2019-11-07 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi David, we also see these failures in our CI. It is intermittent and on all platforms. It happens since Nov 4. We saw the following ones you already listed: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/allocation/AP12/ap12t001/TestDescription.java vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t005/Test

RE: RFR(S): 8228649: [PPC64] SA reads wrong slots from interpreter frames

2019-07-30 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
essage- > From: Doerr, Martin > Sent: Freitag, 26. Juli 2019 13:02 > To: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net; hotspot-runtime- > d...@openjdk.java.net; Lindenmaier, Goetz ; > Gustavo Romero > Subject: RFR(S): 8228649: [PPC64] SA reads wrong slots from interpreter > fr

RE: RFR(S): 8224230: [PPC64, s390] Support AsyncGetCallTrace

2019-05-20 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
LGTM Goetz! > -Original Message- > From: Doerr, Martin > Sent: Montag, 20. Mai 2019 17:49 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; serviceability- > d...@openjdk.java.net; JC Beyler ; Volker Simonis > (volker.simo...@gmail.com) > Subject: RE: RFR(S): 8224230: [PPC64, s390] Supp

RE: RFR(S): 8224230: [PPC64, s390] Support AsyncGetCallTrace

2019-05-20 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Doerr, Martin > Sent: Montag, 20. Mai 2019 17:32 > To: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net; JC Beyler ; > Volker Simonis (volker.simo...@gmail.com) ; > Lindenmaier, Goetz > Subject: RFR(S): 8224230: [PPC64, s390] Support

RE: JDK-8217473: SA: Tests using ClhsdbLauncher fail on SAP docker containers

2019-02-01 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
s.java > >serviceability/sa/ClhsdbThread.java > > > > Are these all failures that go back to the attach issue? > > > > Best regards, > >Goetz. > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Lindenmaier, Goetz >

RE: JDK-8217473: SA: Tests using ClhsdbLauncher fail on SAP docker containers

2019-01-31 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
ForG1.java serviceability/sa/ClhsdbScanOops.java serviceability/sa/ClhsdbThread.java Are these all failures that go back to the attach issue? Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2019 12:54 > To: 'Jini Ge

RE: HotSpot Serviceability Agent (SA) Survey

2019-01-31 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, any news on this? We get questions for the results by the people I made participate in this :) Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: serviceability-dev On > Behalf Of Stephen Fitch > Sent: Dienstag, 3. Juli 2018 14:18 > To: Per Liden ; serviceability-dev@openjdk.jav

RE: JDK-8217473: SA: Tests using ClhsdbLauncher fail on SAP docker containers

2019-01-31 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Jini, I pushed it into our testing: https://ci.sapmachine.io/view/Build%20My%20Branch/job/branch-build-service/43/ the build is running ... Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: serviceability-dev On > Behalf Of Jini George > Sent: Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2019 12:59 > To

RE: RFR: JDK-8215544: SA: Modify ClhsdbLauncher to add sudo privileges to enable MacOS tests on Mach5

2019-01-21 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Sure, I'll try to test it. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Jini George > Sent: Sonntag, 20. Januar 2019 17:12 > To: David Holmes ; Lindenmaier, Goetz > ; serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8215544: SA: Modify Clh

RE: RFR: JDK-8215544: SA: Modify ClhsdbLauncher to add sudo privileges to enable MacOS tests on Mach5

2019-01-18 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Jini, we see test failing after this change arrived deeper in our infrastructure. On a linuxx86_64 docker container it does not work. This is because you now throw Error() if shouldSAAttach() returns false. I think you need this: --- a/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/sa/ClhsdbLauncher.java

RE: RFR(S): 8215975: [testbug] Adapt nsk tests to the PPC, S390 and AIX platforms.

2019-01-03 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Thanks Serguei! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: serguei.spit...@oracle.com > Sent: Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2019 10:13 > To: Volker Simonis ; Lindenmaier, Goetz > > Cc: serviceability-dev (serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net) d...@openjdk.java.net&g

RE: RFR(S): 8215975: [testbug] Adapt nsk tests to the PPC, S390 and AIX platforms.

2019-01-03 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
. Januar 2019 09:50 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: gary.ad...@oracle.com; serviceability-dev (serviceability- > d...@openjdk.java.net) > Subject: Re: RFR(S): 8215975: [testbug] Adapt nsk tests to the PPC, S390 and > AIX platforms. > > Looks good to me. > > Than

RE: RFR(S): 8215975: [testbug] Adapt nsk tests to the PPC, S390 and AIX platforms.

2019-01-02 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
ed by you? http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr18/8215975-nskTests/02/ Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: gary.ad...@oracle.com > Sent: Montag, 31. Dezember 2018 16:59 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; serviceability-dev > (serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net)

RE: RFR(S): 8215975: [testbug] Adapt nsk tests to the PPC, S390 and AIX platforms.

2018-12-31 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
touch them. Webrev with alloc001: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr18/8215975-nskTests/02/ Best regards, Goetz. > > > On 12/31/18 8:48 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Some of the nsk tests are not properly configured for the > > above

RFR(S): 8215975: [testbug] Adapt nsk tests to the PPC, S390 and AIX platforms.

2018-12-31 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, Some of the nsk tests are not properly configured for the above platforms: nsk/jvmti/RetransformClasses/retransform003/TestDriver.java: nsk/jvmti/SetNativeMethodPrefix/SetNativeMethodPrefix002/TestDriver.java The tests use the path to native libraries, which is named "LIBPATH" on AIX.

RE: 8215534: [testbug] some jfr test don't check @requires vm.hasJFR

2018-12-13 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Thanks Erik! Pushed. Best regards, Goetz > -Original Message- > From: serviceability-dev On > Behalf Of Erik Gahlin > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 12:34 PM > To: security-...@openjdk.java.net; serviceability-dev (serviceability- > d...@openjdk.java.net) > Subject: Re: 8215534: [t

RE: 8215534: [testbug] some jfr test don't check @requires vm.hasJFR

2018-12-13 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Thanks Sundar! Best regards Goetz > -Original Message- > From: Sundararajan Athijegannathan > > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 9:47 AM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: security-...@openjdk.java.net; serviceability-dev (serviceability- > d...@openjdk.java.net) &

8215534: [testbug] some jfr test don't check @requires vm.hasJFR

2018-12-12 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, These tests lack @requires vm.hasJFR, thus they are failing on AIX. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr18/8215334-JFR_requires/01/ Please review. I will push this to jdk12 as it is a testbug if I miss the RDP deadline. Best regards, Goetz.

RE: [8u] [RFR] 8140482: Various minor code improvements (runtime)

2018-11-22 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Dalibor, thanks for the info! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: dalibor topic > Sent: Donnerstag, 22. November 2018 11:51 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Andrew Hughes > ; serviceability-dev d...@openjdk.java.net>; hotspot-dev > Subject: R

RE: [8u] [RFR] 8140482: Various minor code improvements (runtime)

2018-11-22 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, Doesn't this have to be posted to jdk8u-dev? I had a look at the backport. Including 7127191 confused me a bit. Is it good to hide the fact that this was backported in the repository? In os_linux one fix is missing, is this on purpose? I don't think this is a critical issue, though, so leav

RE: RFR (XS) JDK-8207745: serviceability/sa/TestJmapCore.java times out parsing a 4GB hprof file

2018-10-04 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
e review. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Sharath Ballal > Sent: Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2018 08:03 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; serviceability-dev > > Subject: RE: RFR (XS) JDK-8207745: serviceability/sa/TestJmapCore.java times > out parsing a 4GB h

RE: RFR (XS) JDK-8207745: serviceability/sa/TestJmapCore.java times out parsing a 4GB hprof file

2018-09-28 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Sharath, what do you think about bringing this fix to jdk11u? We run the tests there regularly and see this problem, too. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: serviceability-dev On > Behalf Of Sharath Ballal > Sent: Montag, 24. September 2018 05:49 > To: serviceabilit

RE: JDK-8199700: SA: Enable jhsdb jtreg tests for Mac OS X

2018-07-12 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
value of [0] > -Original Message- > From: Jini George > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 6:43 PM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; serviceability- > d...@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: JDK-8199700: SA: Enable jhsdb jtreg tests for Mac OS X > > > > > > I'll run

RE: JDK-8199700: SA: Enable jhsdb jtreg tests for Mac OS X

2018-07-12 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Jini, I had a look at your change. It makes tests fail if shouldSAAttach returns false. Now, these tests say "Errror: cannot attach", while before they would terminate silently. It is not an Error if the SA can not attach. You can reproduce this by just changing Platform.shouldSAAttach() t

RE: RFR(S/M): 8205419: [testbug] TestJmapCore failing without SA: introduce @requires vm.hasSA

2018-06-25 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, Thanks for reviewing! Yes, what Jini is saying is also what I found in the comments. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Chris Plummer > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 7:02 PM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; 'Jini George' > ; serviceability

RE: RFR(S/M): 8205419: [testbug] TestJmapCore failing without SA: introduce @requires vm.hasSA

2018-06-25 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Jini Thanks for reviewing again, I fixed the typo's! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Jini George > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 6:20 PM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; 'Chris Plummer' > ; serviceability-dev (serviceability- > d...@open

RE: RFR(S/M): 8205419: [testbug] TestJmapCore failing without SA: introduce @requires vm.hasSA

2018-06-22 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
gards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Jini George > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 12:18 PM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; 'Chris Plummer' > ; serviceability-dev (serviceability- > d...@openjdk.java.net) > Subject: Re: RFR(S/M): 8205419: [testbug] TestJmap

RE: RFR(S/M): 8205419: [testbug] TestJmapCore failing without SA: introduce @requires vm.hasSA

2018-06-21 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
ne. Even if you Sudo the jtreg runner as proposed in JDK-8199700. Thanks and best regards, Goetz > -Original Message- > From: David Holmes > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 1:14 PM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; serviceability-dev > (serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net) d...@

RE: RFR(S/M): 8205419: [testbug] TestJmapCore failing without SA: introduce @requires vm.hasSA

2018-06-20 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
s for mac, they are also done by @requires and not as a check using Platform at runtime. > Sorry, I don't have an answer to your VMProps evaluation question. You > might need to ask a wider audience than just svc. Whom should I ask? Hotspot-dev? Best regards, Goetz. > > thank

RFR(S/M): 8205419: [testbug] TestJmapCore failing without SA: introduce @requires vm.hasSA

2018-06-20 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, TestJmapCore is failing on aix because there jhsdb is not implemented. So far, such tests check at runtime Platform.shouldSAAttach() which is missing in TestJmapCore. Instead, I implement @requires vm.hasSAandCanAttach. This makes jtreg skip the tests without compiling and starting them. I a

RE: RFR(XS): 8205108: [testbug] Fix pattern matching in jstatd tests.

2018-06-20 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Arno, thanks for the 'r'eview! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Zeller, Arno > Sent: Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2018 10:12 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: serviceability-dev (serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net) d...@openjdk.java.net>; Thomas

RE: RFR(XS): 8205108: [testbug] Fix pattern matching in jstatd tests.

2018-06-19 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
ginal Message- > From: Thomas Stüfe [mailto:thomas.stu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Samstag, 16. Juni 2018 19:26 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: serviceability-dev (serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net) d...@openjdk.java.net> > Subject: Re: RFR(XS): 8205108: [testbug] Fix pattern matching

RFR(XS): 8205108: [testbug] Fix pattern matching in jstatd tests.

2018-06-16 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, Please review this test fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr18/8205108-fixJstatDTestPattern/01/ The values for 'M' must be parsed as PERCENTAGE_OR_DASH. The parsing of numbers should not depend on the locale. I changed the parsing to use java.text.NumberFormat Best regards, Goetz.

RE: RFR(S): 8204654: [testbug] Fix pattern matching in jstat tests.

2018-06-14 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Goetz. > > > Rest seems fine. > > ..Thomas > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Lindenmaier, Goetz > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > please review this test fix: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr18/8204654-fixJstatTest/01 > > > > gcCau

RFR(S): 8204654: [testbug] Fix pattern matching in jstat tests.

2018-06-11 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, please review this test fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr18/8204654-fixJstatTest/01 gcCauseOutput1.awk: The pattern scans 11 numbers, while the output contains 13. Also, more '-' are possible then checked. The other awk scripts need to check more patterns where '-' can appear. W

RFR(S):

2018-06-11 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, please review this test fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr18/8204654-fixJstatTest/01 gcCauseOutput1.awk: The pattern scans 11 numbers, while the output contains 13. Also, more '-' are possible then checked. The other awk scripts need to check more patterns where '-' can appear. W

RE: RFR(S): 8200720: Print additional information in thread dump (times, allocated bytes etc.)

2018-06-05 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi this discussion touched a lot of points so far, which seem to lead to different conclusions. I think we should look at the values printed: 1. cpu=6300.65ms elapsed=123.28s Overhead cpu time: * system calls at thread dump time elapsed time: * 1 system call at thread creation time *

RE: RFR (M): 8201247: Various cleanups in the attach framework

2018-04-11 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
; Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2018 09:45 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; serviceability- > d...@openjdk.java.net > Cc: hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net > Subject: RE: RFR (M): 8201247: Various cleanups in the attach framework > > Hi Goetz, > > thanks for the review.

RE: RFR (M): 8201247: Various cleanups in the attach framework

2018-04-10 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Ah, ok, thanks for the info! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Chris Plummer [mailto:chris.plum...@oracle.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 10. April 2018 19:31 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Langer, Christoph > ; serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net > Cc: hotspot-..

RE: RFR (M): 8201247: Various cleanups in the attach framework

2018-04-10 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Christoph, thanks for doing this laborious change ... comparing all these files :) Change looks good, just some minor comments: You say you are sorting the includes, but in the VirtualMachineImpl.c files the order is changed, but according to which order? It's not alphabetical as in other f

Re: RFR: 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2018-01-15 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, The CSR for this change is approved now. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8191477 If there aren't any more objections, I will push this. Webrev rebased and with updated 2018 copyright messages: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr17/8189102-helpMessage/webrev.08/ Best regards, Goet

RE: FW: RFR(M): 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-12-18 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Lindenmaier, Goetz Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 11:37 AM To: Alan Bateman ; core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; 'compiler-...@openjdk.java.net' ; serviceability-dev (serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net) Subject: RE: FW: RFR(M): 8189102: All to

RE: FW: RFR(M): 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-12-12 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
ateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com] > Sent: Montag, 11. Dezember 2017 17:53 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; core-libs- > d...@openjdk.java.net; 'compiler-...@openjdk.java.net' d...@openjdk.java.net>; serviceability-dev (serviceability- > d...@openjdk.java.net) > Subject: Re: FW:

FW: RFR(M): 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-12-07 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
of them on all the platforms we build. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Oktober 2017 22:07 > To: hotspot-dev developers > Subject: RFR(M): 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help > > Hi >

RE: RFR(S): 8192978: Missing checks and small fixes in jdwp library

2017-12-05 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Christoph, thanks for doing this change. I would appreciate if the coverity findings get into the codebase, at minimum it simplifies repeated runs. I’m not sure about the syntax cleanups, especially invoker.c, this seems too trivial to touch the file. Thanks for explaining inStream.c, I think

RE: RFR: 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-12-01 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
them to our testing :) Thanks for further testing and best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Kumar Srinivasan [mailto:kumar.x.sriniva...@oracle.com] > Sent: Freitag, 1. Dezember 2017 15:42 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: core-libs-...@openjdk.java.

RE: RFR: 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-11-30 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Thanks, Robert! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Robert Field [mailto:robert.fi...@oracle.com] > Sent: Mittwoch, 29. November 2017 19:31 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: Kumar Srinivasan ; serviceability-dev > (serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net) d..

RE: RFR: 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-11-28 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
webrev. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Kumar Srinivasan [mailto:kumar.x.sriniva...@oracle.com] > Sent: Montag, 27. November 2017 17:43 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; 'compiler-...@openjdk.java.net

RE: RFR: 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-11-28 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
is very platform dependent (most differences are between unix/windows) so this platform coverage should suffice I think. I'll post a new webrev later on. Best regards, Goetz. > > Kumar > > > On 11/17/2017 3:23 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote: > > Hi, > > >

RE: 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-11-22 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
. > -Original Message- > From: serviceability-dev [mailto:serviceability-dev- > boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Lindenmaier, Goetz > Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 12:23 PM > To: core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; 'compiler-...@openjdk.java.net' > ; serviceabil

RE: RFR: 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-11-21 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
OK, thanks! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Weijun Wang [mailto:weijun.w...@oracle.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 8:08 AM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; compiler-...@openjdk.java.net; > serviceability-dev (

RE: RFR: 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-11-21 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
ith the same names and we need to keep > the option (and maybe the help screen) as similar as possible. > > I am OK with supporting the --help option undocumented. > > Thanks > Max > > > On Nov 20, 2017, at 9:46 PM, Lindenmaier, Goetz > wrote: > > > > Hi

RE: RFR: 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-11-20 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
] > Sent: Sonntag, 19. November 2017 01:28 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; compiler-...@openjdk.java.net; > serviceability-dev (serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net) d...@openjdk.java.net> > Subject: Re: RFR: 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h an

RE: RFR: 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-11-20 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com] > Sent: Samstag, 18. November 2017 09:42 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; core-libs- > d...@openjdk.java.net; 'compiler-...@openjdk.java.net' d...@openjdk.java.net>; serviceability-dev (serviceability- > d...@openjdk.java.net) >

RE: RFR: 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-11-20 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Message- > From: Robert Field [mailto:robert.fi...@oracle.com] > Sent: Freitag, 17. November 2017 20:07 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; compiler-...@openjdk.java.net; > serviceability-dev (serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net) d...@openjdk.java.net> &g

RE: RFR: 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-11-20 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
{ @Override public void process(OptionHelper helper, String option) throws InvalidValueException { Log log = helper.getLog(); > -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Gibbons [mailto:jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com] > Sent: Freitag, 17. November 2017

RFR: 8189102: All tools should support -?, -h and --help

2017-11-17 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, please review this change. I also filed a CSR for this: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr17/8189102-helpMessage/webrev.02/ Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189102 CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8191477 See the webrev for a detailed description of the changes.

RE: Proposal: ModuleReferenceImpl.c to use ReleaseStringUTFChars not jvmtiDeallocate

2017-08-29 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Steve, There are three development repos for jdk10: client, hs (hotspot) and jdk10. Where changes are submitted depends on the focus of the change. This goes along with the mailing lists it was discussed on. E.g. if you change in the gc, you get reviews on the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list and t

RE: RFR(S): [testbug] add @requires vm.cds to CDS tests in jdk test suite

2017-08-28 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi David, thanks for looking at my change! > Should JDK-8185436 have made the changes to TEST.ROOT? I don't > understand all the changes that have been added there. Did JDK-8185436 > make VMProps.java dependent on WhitBox API but not provide a means to > actually build VMProps properly?? 8185436

RFR(S): [testbug] add @requires vm.cds to CDS tests in jdk test suite

2017-08-24 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, Could I please get a review for this small fix to the tests? http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr17/8186719-cdsRequires/webrev.01/ I introduces property @requires vm.cds in the hotspot test suite, and now identified three tests in the jdk suite that require the same. Best regards, Goetz.

Re: RFR(XS): 8185112: [TESTBUG] Servicability tests cannot parse float if non US locale.

2017-08-20 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi David, Thanks for reviewing and sponsoring! Best, Götz > Am 21.08.2017 um 04:00 schrieb David Holmes : > > Hi Goetz, > >> On 18/08/2017 4:08 PM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote: >> Hi, >> Thanks Volker! >> Could I please get a second review? I

RE: RFR(XS): 8185112: [TESTBUG] Servicability tests cannot parse float if non US locale.

2017-08-17 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
t 2017 19:33 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: serviceability-dev (serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net) d...@openjdk.java.net>; Zeller, Arno > Subject: Re: RFR(XS): 8185112: [TESTBUG] Servicability tests cannot parse > float > if non US locale. > > Thanks Goetz - looks good

RE: RFR(XS): 8185112: [TESTBUG] Servicability tests cannot parse float if non US locale.

2017-08-03 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
sage- > From: Volker Simonis [mailto:volker.simo...@gmail.com] > Sent: Freitag, 28. Juli 2017 16:45 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: serviceability-dev (serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net) d...@openjdk.java.net>; Zeller, Arno > Subject: Re: RFR(XS): 8185112: [TESTBUG] Servica

RE: RFR(XS): 8185112: [TESTBUG] Servicability tests cannot parse float if non US locale.

2017-07-28 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Volker Simonis [mailto:volker.simo...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 11:49 AM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: serviceability-dev (serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net) d...@openjdk.java.net>; Zeller, Arno >

RFR(XS): 8185112: [TESTBUG] Servicability tests cannot parse float if non US locale.

2017-07-24 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, Some tests use Float.valueOf for String to float converting. If an other locale than US is used the test failed. We observed this on Mac. Changed to use NumberFormat to work with all locales. Please review this change. I please need a sponsor. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr17/8185112-m

Wrong merge after 8169232: SA: TestCpoolForInvokeDynamic.java fails with ...

2017-01-17 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, I think this merge http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/a28955e16c78 wrongly added + * @ignore 8169232 to TestCpoolForInvokeDynamic.java which was fixed in 8169232: SA: TestCpoolForInvokeDynamic.java fails with sun.jvm.hotspot.debugger.DebuggerException: binary search

RE: RFR(M): 8170663: Fix minor issues in corelib and servicabilty coding.

2016-12-14 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
om: David Holmes [mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 9:55 PM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; > daniel.daughe...@oracle.com; 'Dmitry Samersoff' > ; Java Core Libs d...@openjdk.java.net>; serviceability-dev (serviceability- > d...@openjdk.java.net) > Su

RE: RFR(M): 8170663: Fix minor issues in corelib and servicabilty coding.

2016-12-14 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
> object to the change to k_standard.c for the same reason. Ok, I remove that too. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: David Holmes [mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com] > Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2016 12:29 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; > daniel.da

RE: RFR(M): 8170663: Fix minor issues in corelib and servicabilty coding.

2016-12-14 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
avid Holmes [mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com] > Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2016 11:42 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; > daniel.daughe...@oracle.com; 'Dmitry Samersoff' > ; Java Core Libs d...@openjdk.java.net>; serviceability-dev (serviceability- > d...@openjdk.java.net) > Subj

RE: RFR(M): 8170663: Fix minor issues in corelib and servicabilty coding.

2016-12-14 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
. Dezember 2016 11:04 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; > daniel.daughe...@oracle.com; 'Dmitry Samersoff' > ; Java Core Libs d...@openjdk.java.net>; serviceability-dev (serviceability- > d...@openjdk.java.net) > Subject: Re: RFR(M): 8170663: Fix minor issues in corelib and se

RE: RFR(M): 8170663: Fix minor issues in corelib and servicabilty coding.

2016-12-14 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Dezember 2016 23:03 > To: daniel.daughe...@oracle.com; Lindenmaier, Goetz > ; 'Dmitry Samersoff' > ; Java Core Libs d...@openjdk.java.net>; serviceability-dev (serviceability- > d...@openjdk.java.net) > Subject: Re: RFR(M): 8170663: Fix minor issues in corelib and servicabi

RE: RFR(M): 8170663: Fix minor issues in corelib and servicabilty coding.

2016-12-08 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, I'll post a new webrev once the hs code has been propagated to dev. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: David Holmes [mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com] > Sent: Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2016 23:03 > To: daniel.daughe...@oracle.com; Lindenmaier,

RE: RFR(M): 8170663: Fix minor issues in corelib and servicabilty coding.

2016-12-08 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
ked me to add it. But I think it's ok. Can I consider this reviewed now? I.e. could I push it once 8066474 is promoted and Joe Darcy agreed? Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: David Holmes [mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com] > Sent: Donnerstag, 8. Dezemb

RE: RFR(M): 8170663: Fix minor issues in corelib and servicabilty coding.

2016-12-07 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
samers...@oracle.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 2:43 PM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Java Core Libs > ; serviceability-dev (serviceability- > d...@openjdk.java.net) > Subject: Re: RFR(M): 8170663: Fix minor issues in corelib and servicabilty > coding. > > Goetz, > > SD

RE: RFR(M): 8170663: Fix minor issues in corelib and servicabilty coding.

2016-12-07 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Ah, you're right, the 'lastslash' assignment! Thanks, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: David Holmes [mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 10:32 AM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; 'Dmitry Samersoff' > ; Java Core Libs

RE: RFR(M): 8170663: Fix minor issues in corelib and servicabilty coding.

2016-12-07 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
rc/jdk.jdwp.agent/unix/native/libdt_socket/socket_md.c > It might be better to write > arg.l_linger = (on) ? (unsigned short)value.i : 0; > and leave one copy of setsockopt() call Yes, looks better. Best regards, Goetz > > -Dmitry > > > On 2016-12-06 16:12, Lindenma

RFR(M): 8170663: Fix minor issues in corelib and servicabilty coding.

2016-12-06 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, This change fixes some minor issues found in our code scans. I hope this correctly addresses corelib and serviceability issues. Please review: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8170663-corlib_s11y/webrev.01/ Best regards, Goetz. Changes in detail: e_asin.c Code scan reports missing

RE: RFR(S): PING! JDK-8134434: JVM_DoPrivileged() fires assert(_exception_caught == false) failed: _exception_caught is out of phase

2016-07-11 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
-runtime-dev d...@openjdk.java.net>; hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net; > Lindenmaier, Goetz > Subject: Re: RFR(S): PING! JDK-8134434: JVM_DoPrivileged() fires > assert(_exception_caught == false) failed: _exception_caught is out of phase > > Everybody, > > Updated we

RE: RFR(S): PING! JDK-8134434: JVM_DoPrivileged() fires assert(_exception_caught == false) failed: _exception_caught is out of phase

2016-07-11 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Dmitry, thanks for looking at this issue. I think your fix will crash if thread->jvmti_thread_state(); returns NULL. Also, please add the #include with leading directory prims/ at the proper alphabetic position. Also, you could add the test Richard supplied, see below. Best regards, Goetz.

RE: New Serviceability Group Lead: Staffan Larsen

2016-07-07 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Vote: yes Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: serviceability-dev [mailto:serviceability-dev- > boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Daniel D. Daugherty > Sent: Freitag, 8. Juli 2016 01:48 > To: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subject: CFV: New Serviceability Group

RE: RFR(M): 8141529: Fix handling of _JAVA_SR_SIGNUM

2015-11-17 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Great, looks good. Thanks a lot! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Dmitry Samersoff [mailto:dmitry.samers...@oracle.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 17. November 2015 14:42 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz; Thomas Stüfe > Cc: David Holmes; hotspot-runtime-...@o

RE: RFR(M): 8141529: Fix handling of _JAVA_SR_SIGNUM

2015-11-17 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
. > -Original Message- > From: Dmitry Samersoff [mailto:dmitry.samers...@oracle.com] > Sent: Montag, 16. November 2015 11:53 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz; Thomas Stüfe > Cc: David Holmes; hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net; serviceability- > dev > Subject: Re: RFR(M): 814

RE: RFR(M): 8141529: Fix handling of _JAVA_SR_SIGNUM

2015-11-17 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
That's great, thanks a lot! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Dmitry Samersoff [mailto:dmitry.samers...@oracle.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 17. November 2015 09:34 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz; Thomas Stüfe > Cc: David Holmes; hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java

RE: RFR(M): 8141529: Fix handling of _JAVA_SR_SIGNUM

2015-11-16 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
s, Goetz. -Original Message- From: Dmitry Samersoff [mailto:dmitry.samers...@oracle.com] Sent: Montag, 16. November 2015 09:23 To: David Holmes; Thomas Stüfe; Lindenmaier, Goetz Cc: serviceability-dev; hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: RFR(M): 8141529: Fix handling of _JAVA_SR_SIG

RE: RFR(M): 8141529: Fix handling of _JAVA_SR_SIGNUM

2015-11-16 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
oses. Here is the new webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/webrevs/8141529-NSIG/webrev.02/ Best regards, Goetz. From: Thomas Stüfe [mailto:thomas.stu...@gmail.com] Sent: Freitag, 13. November 2015 10:54 To: Lindenmaier, Goetz Cc: Dmitry Samersoff; David Holmes; hotspot-runtime-...@open

  1   2   >