>
> I think the conversation will shift a bit if you explain what you mean with:
>
> "// inspect the frames of that thread doing any needed business with them"
>
> What exactly do you have in mind? Do you want to change the stack in some
> way?
I would like to inspect the variable's name/value
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Pietro Paolini
wrote:
>>
>> I think the conversation will shift a bit if you explain what you mean with:
>>
>> "// inspect the frames of that thread doing any needed business with them"
>>
>> What exactly do you have in mind? Do you want to change the stack in some
Hi Alan,
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Alan Bateman
wrote:
> On 09/04/2018 16:50, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>
>> So, I found that I can attach with jcmd just fine, just the process
>> listing does not work.
>>
>> I can only attach via pid, not via command name, which I think stems from
>> the same e
PING: Could you review it?
We need one more reviewer.
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8199519/webrev.03/
Yasumasa
On 2018/04/03 21:37, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
PING: Could you review it?
This change has been passed Mach5 test.
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-
Ping.
Do review the changes.
From: Amit Sapre
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 3:38 PM
To: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RFR : JDK-8042215 -
javax/management/remote/mandatory/connection/ReconnectTest.java
NoSuchObjectException no such object in table
Hello,
Please review
Hi David,
The existing "initComplete" in debugInit.c logic is the debug main thread
initialization complete logic, that does not handle nor needs to wait for
the asynchronous VM initialization that will be reported but must be
completed before the debug loop can start processing cmds.
Thanks
And
Hi Serguei,
I don't have access to the bug database to raise one, are you able to
please?
Summary: JDWP debugger initialization hangs intermittently
Description: If during the JDWP setup initialization the VM initialization
takes slightly longer than the main debug initialization thread a "hang"
Hi Christoph,
thanks for doing this laborious change ... comparing all these files :)
Change looks good, just some minor comments:
You say you are sorting the includes, but in the VirtualMachineImpl.c
files the order is changed, but according to which order? It's
not alphabetical as in other f
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > except maybe the "initially false" and "initially 0" comments as they
>> are just documenting the default values and don't add anything.
>>
>> Yeah, I’ve done this before
On 4/10/18 8:34 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
Hi Christoph,
thanks for doing this laborious change ... comparing all these files :)
Change looks good, just some minor comments:
You say you are sorting the includes, but in the VirtualMachineImpl.c
files the order is changed, but according to wh
Hi Chris,
I ran the jtreg tests under hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/attach and
jdk/com/sun/tools/attach for the main platforms (Windows, Linux X86_64, mac,
solaris and AIX).
I also pushed to submit-hs in branch "JDK-8201247" but it seems I have no luck
and got no notification mails. May I ask y
Hi Christoph,
I'm somewhat new to looking at submit-hs test jobs. However I see know
indication of there being a submit for JDK-8201247, so I don't think it
was run. I'll start my own testing with the last patch you sent out.
thanks,
Chris
On 4/10/18 1:01 PM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi Ch
Hi Andrew,
Okay, I'll file a bug on this topic.
But do you have a standalone test demonstrating this issue?
Thanks,
Serguei
On 4/10/18 06:23, Andrew Leonard wrote:
Hi Serguei,
I don't have acces
Hi Christoph,
I finished testing. No issues.
thanks,
Chris
On 4/10/18 1:08 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Christoph,
I'm somewhat new to looking at submit-hs test jobs. However I see know
indication of there being a submit for JDK-8201247, so I don't think
it was run. I'll start my own testin
Ah, ok, thanks for the info!
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Plummer [mailto:chris.plum...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 10. April 2018 19:31
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Langer, Christoph
> ; serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Cc: hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net
>
15 matches
Mail list logo