om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard
KennedySent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 4:05 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
ShopTalk: Lie Angle Progression
Harry when i was playing well i set my i
Hi
Charlie
When I said I'm not concerned
about Joe Average, this was only in reference to my line of
questioning.
All my customers pay top dollar
for my stuff and its all dialed in to the same standards regardless of playing
level.
I also suspect (as Arnie has
aluded to) that what the Lie
L PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard
KennedySent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 4:05 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
ShopTalk: Lie Angle Progression
Harry when i was playing well i set my irons as follows, SW =
66* AW = 65* PW = 64* 9I =
In a message dated 1/18/03 9:35:49 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
always use the golf club gauge to measure the loft and lie, then calculate the delta to bend, bend the club in the Mitchell, then check the results on the golf club gauge.
Are you saying that the Mitchell is
: RE: ShopTalk: Lie Angle
Progression
Hi Arnie and
Charlie
Our third year in business we broke the
bank and bought a Mitchell Loft and Lie machine with putter
attachment.
I know the standard progression for lie
and we hand select and dial in based on; component wts, cpm
In a message dated 1/18/03 3:41:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why does Tiger need only 1 degree lie change from 5I to 7I? Because that's what he needs! I suspect a lot of other golfers may not
be based on the 1 degree per change in length per 0.5 inches. Checking only a
treatment!! Takes longer but I don’t
feel guilty about it!!
-Original
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003
2:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Lie Angle
Progression
Harry
What I
Harry
What I found working with the pros as well as a lot of single digit handicappers is there is no norm. I have seen the 6 iron come out flatter than the 5. That is why as Tflan suggests that empirical testing is the best. I too bend before assembly as the final length is truer for the indivi
IL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 10:36AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: LieAngle Progression
When I've looked at component catalogue's
some vary by 58 - 63 (5 deg) or 57 - 64 (7 d
rld Class Golf Club Repair Equipment
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, January 18, 2003 3:41:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Lie Angle Progression
Hi Arnie and Charlie
Our third year in business we broke the bank and boug
olf54.com
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 10:36
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Lie
Angle Progression
When I've looked at component catalogue's som
In a message dated 1/17/03 9:34:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I've looked at component catalogue's some vary by 58 - 63 (5 deg) or 57 - 64 (7 deg) from the 2 Iron through to PW.
For the bulk of the players you fit 3 Iron to PW
Lie angle of 2 iron 57*, 3 iron 58*, 4
Harry
I only use those stated mfg. lie angles as a stating point. When actually measured they are usually off by one or two degrees. During my fitting process I have golfers hit a 5 iron and adjust that to a perfect lie for them and use that length, lie and SW I have chosen as a template for t
Hi
Arnie
Based on each iron
getting progressively shorter or longer by 1/2 inch, does this equate to 1
degree lie angle increments?
When I've looked at
component catalogue's some vary by 58 - 63 (5 deg) or 57 - 64 (7 deg) from
the 2 Iron through to PW.
For the bulk of the
players you fit 3
14 matches
Mail list logo
