why don't you release 3.2.6?
Tom Eastep wrote:
Updates are available at
http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/3.2/shorewall-3.2.5/
1) If a DNAT or REDIRECT rule was used where the effective policy
between the source and final destination zones is ACCEPT, the ACCEPT
part of the
Hopefully this hasn't been asked a number of times.. I did some searching,
and didn't come up with anything initially.
I have a machine which is to act as a reverse proxy for ftp traffic. It
sits in the dmz, and receives ftp traffic from the net. Its job is to
pass along that traffic to the
Helder Gaspar Rodrigues wrote:
As you can see 947KB...
Can you help me?
Sounds like you need to increase the IN-BANDWIDTH.
In the output of shorewall show tc, you should see something like the
following:
qdisc ingress :
Sent 49358559 bytes 65794 pkts (dropped
Farkas Levente wrote:
why don't you release 3.2.6?
Note that the second problem listed turned out to be a non-issue. It's not that
3.2.5 is unusually buggy; I've just started announcing known problems when they
are discovered.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently
That did the trick! Many, many thanks. FTP Doesn't work unless it's
passive - but as I understand it the FTP macro should handle active ftp -
so it's probable something to do with the firewall sandwich that the
shorewall instance is in the middle of.
Again, many thanks..
Bill
On Fri, 10
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That did the trick! Many, many thanks. FTP Doesn't work unless it's
passive - but as I understand it the FTP macro should handle active ftp -
so it's probable something to do with the firewall sandwich that the
shorewall instance is in the middle of.
Both passive
Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 10:11:04AM -0800, Tom Eastep wrote:
Helder Gaspar Rodrigues wrote:
Yes that are packet being dropped:
qdisc ingress :
Sent 22676402 bytes 39464 pkt (dropped 244, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p
Helder Gaspar Rodrigues wrote:
Im sorry about that. I will not repeat again.
You just did!
Well I incread step by step the IN-BANDWITH value.
When I raise this value the number of dropped packets decreases.
When I assign 15Mbit I only have 1 packet dropped. When I assign 20Mbit
I dont
Tom Eastep wrote:
Helder Gaspar Rodrigues wrote:
Im sorry about that. I will not repeat again.
You just did!
Well I incread step by step the IN-BANDWITH value.
When I raise this value the number of dropped packets decreases.
When I assign 15Mbit I only have 1 packet dropped. When I
Helder Gaspar Rodrigues wrote:
Im sorry about that. I will not repeat again.
But does so in the very same message !
Well I incread step by step the IN-BANDWITH value.
When I raise this value the number of dropped packets decreases.
When I assign 15Mbit I only have 1 packet dropped. When I
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
I have to preface by saying I have only a faint memory of the tc stuff
in shorewall since it's useless to me on Mandriva since they decided to
ship 2007.0 without the pp2p module. :-(
But I wonder if this sort of thing, putting acks in the highest priority
band
11 matches
Mail list logo
