On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 01:39:46PM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 10/29/18 11:04 AM, Vincas Dargis wrote:
> > On 2018-10-24 23:34, Tom Eastep wrote:
> >> On 10/24/18 9:18 AM, Vincas Dargis wrote:
> >>> What does that mean with regards to Shorewall? Could there potentially
> >>> be incompatibilities
On 10/29/18 11:04 AM, Vincas Dargis wrote:
> On 2018-10-24 23:34, Tom Eastep wrote:
>> On 10/24/18 9:18 AM, Vincas Dargis wrote:
>>> What does that mean with regards to Shorewall? Could there potentially
>>> be incompatibilities on how Shorewall expects Linux firewall to behave?
>>
>> There could
On 2018-10-24 23:34, Tom Eastep wrote:
On 10/24/18 9:18 AM, Vincas Dargis wrote:
What does that mean with regards to Shorewall? Could there potentially
be incompatibilities on how Shorewall expects Linux firewall to behave?
There could certainly be incompatibilities that effect Shorewall
On 10/24/18 9:18 AM, Vincas Dargis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During today's batch of Debian Sid updates I was notified about this
> iptables change:
>
> ```
> iptables (1.8.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> By default, this package will try to use the nf_tables kernel backend
> instead of the
Hi,
During today's batch of Debian Sid updates I was notified about this iptables
change:
```
iptables (1.8.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
By default, this package will try to use the nf_tables kernel backend
instead of the xtables one. Please, read more about this in
