.
--Sandy
From: Murphy, Sandra
Sent: Fri 7/31/2009 9:30 AM
To: sidr@ietf.org
Cc: Sandy Murphy
Subject: [sidr] Request for WG adoption
I am opening a two week call for comments on this request for working
group adoption of draft-huston-sidr-rpki-algs-00.txt
The working group charter does not currently address path security.
But there is always the possibility of modification of the charter,
particularly as we seem to have finally managed to achieve consensus on
a lot of our current work.
--Sandy
-Original Message-
From:
You'll soon be seeing a small number of cleanup actions - two drafts
whose consensus was never officially called and reminders to some
authors that new versions of their draft are needed to address on list
comments. Look for the consensus calls on the list here shortly and for
the author
notice to the group.
--Sandy, speaking with wg co-chair snood on
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Sandra
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 4:12 PM
To: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: WG LC for draft-ietf-sidr-signed-object-01
The authors of draft-ietf-sidr-signed-object-01
(http
Standards Track.
Is that clearer?
--Sandy
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Sandra
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 9:38 AM
To: sidr@ietf.org
Cc: Murphy, Sandra
Subject: RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-10
There was a short intense discussion of the intended RFC status
This is a reminder that the last call is in progress and is ending soon.
I have encouraged people to comment on this in the past. I think it is an
important feature of what we are building and deserves some careful attention.
It would not be good to be faced in the future with the need to
Reminders of some recently completed and ongoing activity. (Brian suggested
reminders and it seems like a good idea to me - comments on the usefulness
encouraged.)
Reminder: Notice the two ongoing requests for your response:
draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-03 wglc to end 3 Nov
I have posted an agenda from requests for time and from drafts with recent
activity to discuss.
Please look at the agenda and tell me whether you think the time you are
allotted is adequate.
We are still considering a time slot change. We have firm offers for a change
to Mon afternoon and a
Guys, guys, guys.
Steve: making reference to a person's company concentrates too much on the
personal. Please be more careful.
Brian, Eric: If you meant some individual contributors who I happen to know
and discuss this with, saying my colleagues was subject to
misinterpretation,
Those who have slots for presentation at the sidr meeting please send slides to
both chairs by Tuesday morning.
Despite similar requests in the past, we seem to frequently have presentations
that show up during the meeting. Please do not do that. Presentations must be
uploaded for everyone
I'm about to request some cleanup of the draft replaced by relationships. If
you see anything incorrect about the list below, please let me know.
The tools page already records some of these replaced by records. However,
the datatracker is authoritative and the datatracker has not caught
definitely have said If Brian meant.
--Sandy, to clarify my previous speaking as wg chair
From: Murphy, Sandra
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 3:47 PM
To: Brian Dickson; Stephen Kent
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm
Dear WG,
Roque mentions below that the authors believe that all comments have been
addressed.
It would help the process and the chairs if those of you who made comments say
whether you believe that your comments have been adequately or acceptably
addressed.
Sandy, speaking as wg chair
Review and comment in the last call period was rather limited. The authors
produced a revised version and not all commenters have responded to the revised
version to say they are satisfied.
I reviewed the document to see if comments were addressed. I have comments -
see below.
I have
: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 10:37 PM
To: Randy Bush
Cc: sidr wg; Murphy, Sandra
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-usecases-02.txt
On 22/12/2011, at 2:32 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
And why not use the documentation prefix(es) and documentation AS(es)
in this draft. rather than 10/8 etc. That's what
About #1:
ROAs are used for origin validation. (*) The bgpsec router needs only the
prefix-AS binding in the ROA, not the crypto part, and only for the origin
validation, not the signature attribute validation. The rpki-rtr protocol is
one way to communicate that binding.
The bgpsec
About your all BGPSEC routers in the global routing system - keep in mind
that the ebgp routers are the ones that need a private key, not all the routers
in an AS.
While we have a lot of info on churn in routing updates, I am not certain how
to predict how much church there will be in the keys
The working group has been requested to adopt draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-impl-01.txt
as a working group draft.
The draft is available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-impl.
Please respond to the list to say whether you accept this draft as a working
group draft and are willing to
Logistics are made for the interim meeting.
To register for the meeting, please send a message to interim-s...@tislabs.com.
There is NO registration fee for this meeting, but please do register so room
arrangements are suitable for the number of attendees. Updates on meeting
logistics will
Forgot to ask:
In your registration message, please indicate your affiliation, for the purpose
of completing the wiki attendee list.
Also, the obligatory note that this is
--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
From: Murphy, Sandra
Sent: Thursday, January 26
will not be noted on the wiki attendees page.
--Sandy, speaking as co-chair
-Original Message-
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:sidr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Murphy, Sandra
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 5:00 PM
To: sidr@ietf.org
Cc: sidr-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] interim
7:57 PM
To: Murphy, Sandra
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] agenda for upcoming interim meeting
Is going to be any kind of remote participation (jabber, audio, etc.)?
Thanks,
-as
On 30 Jan 2012, at 21:34, Murphy, Sandra wrote:
I have received a couple of requests to present
.
And in order becomes a more complex idea as well.
-Sandy, speaking as regular ol' member
From: ross.ander...@cl.cam.ac.uk [rossjander...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 3:05 AM
To: sidr@ietf.org list
Cc: Murphy, Sandra; Brian Dickson
Subject
).
--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
From: Murphy, Sandra
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 6:22 PM
To: Murphy, Sandra; sidr@ietf.org
Cc: sidr-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: interim meeting registration
I should have known that IETF-ers would not be happy with the free
Congratulations to the working group and in particular to the authors for the
publication of the following RFCs. Thanks to the authors for all the hard work
to
complete this large set of documents.
1.RFC 6480 on An Infrastructure to Support Secure Internet Routing
M. Lepinski, S.
A WebEx session has been arranged by the IETF Secretariat for remote
participation in the interim sidr meeting Thu 9 Mar.
Below is the WebEx announcement of the meeting.
--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
===
The IETF SIDR co-chairs invite you
The interim sidr meeting will be located at
Bristol Hotel
1055 First Avenue, San Diego, California 92101
Phone: 800-662-4477
http://www.thebristolsandiego.com/
All those who registered should have received a message with this info.
The message also said that we would be in their City Scene
First, I'd like to point to everyone that the IETF Secretariat (happiness and
long life to them) now support interim meetings with a proceedings page.
The proceedings page for the Thu 09 Feb 2012 interim sidr meeting is here:
Speaking as only a regular ol' member.
btw: I agree with the this is absolutely not for now part.
Your idea authorizes one prefix and says more specifics are OK.
Synopsis: It doesn't buy you much and it makes life much more complicated.
First, saying more specifics are OK does not buy you
Here's the usual reminder of important upcoming dates for IETF 83:
•2012-02-27 (Monday): Working Group Chair approval for initial document
(Version -00) submissions appreciated by 17:00 PT (UTC -8).
•2012-03-02 (Friday): Final agenda to be published.
•2012-03-05 (Monday): Internet Draft Cut-off
The interim meeting on Thu 9 Feb was an all day event. The minutes (for the 8
hour day) are below.
Jabber logs of the meeting are at
http://www.ietf.org/jabber/logs/sidr/2012-02-09.html
http://www.ietf.org/jabber/logs/sidr/2012-02-10.html
(No we did not talk for two days. The jabber logs are
Goburdhan
Randy Bachman
Shane Amante
Adam Vitkovsky
Stewart
Brian Dickson
Jan Borkenhagen
Michael Sinatra
Sandra Murphy
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Murphy, Sandra
[sandra.mur...@sparta.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 5:32
From: Randy Bush [ra...@psg.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 10:25 PM
To: Murphy, Sandra
Cc: sidr@ietf.org; proceedi...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] attendees at interim sidr meeting 09 Feb 2012
In addition, the webex recording reports the webex attendees
on this one) to prevent bloat to their system.
--Sandy
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Murphy, Sandra
[sandra.mur...@sparta.com]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 4:37 AM
To: Randy Bush
Cc: proceedi...@ietf.org; sidr@ietf.org
Subject
The following request has been made for wg adoption of
draft-ymbk-bgpsec-rtr-rekeying-00.txt.
The draft is available at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-impl-01.
Please respond to the list to say whether you accept this draft as a working
group draft and are willing to work on
The co-chairs have arranged a virtual meeting for Mar 24, 2012.
As per process, an agenda will be announced by one week before the event.
This is scheduled for a full day - we will use this experience to gauge future
meetings.
--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
From: messen...@webex.com
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Murphy, Sandra
[sandra.mur...@sparta.com]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 11:04 AM
To: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG adoption call for draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-impl-01.txt
A suggestion was made at the last wg call
I have seen few requests for agenda time at the sidr meeting.
The draft agendas are due Wed of this week. If you think you have something to
address to the entire group, now would be a good time to ask for a time slot.
--Sandy
___
sidr mailing list
In the interim meeting, the consensus was that we needed idr to be involved in
any definition and solution for route leaks. It was decided to discuss a
message to the idr wg on the sidr list.
Brian Dickson has submitted drafts about route leaks, as he offered in the
meeting.
So here is a
Sorry, did not reply to the list.
--Sandy
From: Murphy, Sandra
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:40 AM
To: nalini iyer
Subject: RE: [sidr] question on SKI and router public key retrieval in
signature attribute in BGPSEC
Speaking as regular ol' member
of a new routing
feature?
--Sandy
From: Eric Osterweil [eosterw...@verisign.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 2:38 PM
To: George, Wes
Cc: Murphy, Sandra; sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] route leaks message to IDR
I'd also like to add that (if I'm
A draft agenda for the IETF 83 meeting has been uploaded.
If you believe that you requested time on the agenda, or you want to make a
request to be on the agenda, there's still time to contact the chairs and/or
list.
There may be movement of presentations to accommodate the presenters or to
Here is the agenda for the sidr virtual meeting on Sat 24 Mar 2012.
UTC 0800-1030. Protocol spec
In depth protocol review, doc structure, forward path, etc.
draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-02
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol
UTC 1030-1230 Break
UTC
From: Brian Dickson [brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 6:36 PM
To: Murphy, Sandra
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] replies needed quickly RE: possible additional meeting times
Given that there is not a lot of lead time before
is unclear.
Please send suggested rewording.
--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
--sent 7:04amEDT, 11:04UTC
From: Eric Osterweil [eosterw...@verisign.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 5:35 PM
To: Stephen Kent
Cc: George, Wes; Murphy, Sandra; sidr@ietf.org
In the flurry of apologetic emails that preceeded and followed this
announcement, I did not apolgize to the working group.
This was my strictly my bungle, in two different directions.
First, I announced the meeting to the sidr mailing list within the time frame
required by process. The bungle
This has become a long and tortuous rat hole, leading off into branching rat
holes.
It all started with prospective text to the idr wg about the route leaks
problem.
The furor started over the suggested text's stated motivation for asking.
But there have been no objections to conferring with
As the last few day's email explosion has shown, this is a complex topic,
covering routing, security, operations, governance, policy, etc.
The complexities mean more energy and time for debate is needed than is
possible in IETF meetings. Progress so far in the working group has been aided
The Secretariat confirmed today that the sidr meeting will have the slot on
Monday 1300-1500 vacated by EAI.
The IETF agenda site is not yet updated with this information, as they must
also do a room change.
Brian Dickson has agreed to move his presentation to the Monday time slot.
Slides need to be uploaded to the meetings materials site before the meeting.
The chair laptops will be busy, so if you walk in with a memory stick, you may
be speaking to a blank screen.
So presenters on Wednesday, please have your slides to the wg chairs by
midnight Wed morning IETF local
I uploaded a new agenda that covers both days.
On Monday, we will have Brian Dickson talking about route leaks first. Brian
will be remote from six hours before us, so be extra attentive.
Sriram will go next as his presentation got shortened last time (by extensive
route leaks discussion,
Here is the info for the WebEx session for today's wg meeting.
This was set up for Brian to use in a remote presentation but anyone can join
who needs to.
--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
Hello SIDR Working Group,
Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group invites you to attend a Web seminar
Thank you, Geoff. I agree.
--Sandy
From: Geoff Huston [g...@apnic.net]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 11:33 PM
To: RFC Errata System
Cc: g...@apnic.net; robe...@apnic.net; stbry...@cisco.com; adr...@olddog.co.uk;
Murphy, Sandra; morr...@ops-netman.net
Moderate badness in the Monday meeting was due to my laptop communication
problems. Suggestions welcome as how to handle such a situation better. Pkt
loss for me varied 0-33-50-100%. Help desk and NOC were unable to diagnose.
On hotel wireless, I see congestion (judged by ping latencies)
The webex session on Monday failed completely, due to laptop wireless
incapability to maintain a connection (20-50-80-100% packet loss).
The webex session on Wednesday (this morning) seemed to work (alternate
networking arranged).
But being the presentation laptop for webex, I was unable to
These two drafts have been expired for a good while now. Do the authors intend
to pick them up now that the CP document is published?
The wg should take a look at these and see if there is still interest in
pursuing them.
--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
Speaking as regular ol' member.
Too bad you couldn't make the meeting, Danny.
This is in bgpsec path validation and the signalling would go no further than
the bgpsec path validation would go.
A method of signalling that was mentioned was the validity periods on the
router keys so all RPKI
i don't think the rsync scale issues surprise anyone that was paying
attention.
I am not sure what part of the presentation you are talking about. In the day
in the life presentation, I saw only differences due to implementation, not
differences due to scale.
And in the rpki over
, March 29, 2012 7:51 AM
To: Murphy, Sandra
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] remote participation experience today
Sandra,
I attend the meeting remotely on both Monday and Wednesday. I did not feel the
need for Webex as the audio streaming + jabber worked just fine.
My only comment is to re
From: Brian Dickson [brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 8:55 AM
To: Murphy, Sandra
Cc: Christopher Morrow; Sriram, Kotikalapudi; Chris Morrow; sidr@ietf.org list
Subject: Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-usecases-03.txt
Sandy,
The use case example I
Speaking as regular ol' member
Shane, I'm having some trouble following your argument.
Here's what I think you are saying.
You are exploring options for dropping an update based on detecting a loop -
whether the loop detection should be before or after the check of the path
signatures.
If
speaking as regular ol' member
There is no reverse direction.
Incoming paths that are unsigned are not propagated by bgpsec speakers as
signed paths.
And intradomain BGP speakers do not use bgpsec (ebgp sessions only).
And AS4_PATH is not needed in bgpsec speakers - who are assumed to be
From: Robert Raszuk [rob...@raszuk.net]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 1:22 PM
To: Murphy, Sandra
Cc: Sriram, Kotikalapudi; i...@ietf.org List; sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-02: Path shortening
lengthening
Hi Sandy
speaking as regular ol' member
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 9:15 PM, Danny McPherson [da...@tcb.net] said:
From there, we can discuss the issue of, for example, HOW TO onboard
and purge signing and validating certificates to routers from the RPKI --
[I suspect the intention was to use rpki-rtr
There has been a rearrangement of the agenda items to help out some speakers'
time restrictions.
The new agenda moves the pfx-validate discussion to the first thing on the
agenda.
The agenda is posted at
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr/trac/wiki/InterimMeeting20120430
0900-0910 Agenda
The attendees who have registered for the sidr interim meeting on Mon Apr 30
are recorded at:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr/trac/wiki/InterimMeeting20120430-attendees
If you believe that you did register, and do not see your name on this list,
please forward your original registration
One of the upcoming sidr interim meetings is scheduled to be held in
association with NANOG 55 in Vancouver. The hope was to attract operators from
NANOG to attend the sidr meeting.
Originally, there were indications that NANOG might be able to provide meeting
room support for an interim sidr
Times are in EDT: UTC-4.
--Sandy
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Geoff Huston
[g...@apnic.net]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 1:14 AM
To: Chris Morrow
Cc: Christopher Morrow; sidr-cha...@ietf.org; sidr@ietf.org
Subject:
For those attending remotely, here is the full webex invitation.
--Sandy
From: messen...@webex.com [messen...@webex.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:56 AM
To: Murphy, Sandra
Subject: Invitation to Web seminar: firstinterimbeforeVancouver
[https
of Murphy, Sandra
[sandra.mur...@sparta.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:21 AM
To: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: [sidr] FW: Invitation to Web seminar: firstinterimbeforeVancouver
For those attending remotely, here is the full webex invitation.
--Sandy
From: messen
A reminder that consensus will be called on Friday morning (early).
--Sandy
From: Murphy, Sandra
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 5:13 AM
To: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: RE: date/time/logistics for Jun meeting in association with nanog
Note that we are coming up
I actually was pleased with the amount of useful participation we had from
remote participants. Of course, that does not mean that all participants were
as pleased with their experience.
I'm glad that you found the note-taking useful. I'm sorry that the typing of
the note taking disturbed
of Murphy, Sandra
[sandra.mur...@sparta.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 1:28 PM
To: Danny McPherson; Christopher Morrow
Cc: sidr-...@tools.ietf.org; sidr-cha...@tools.ietf.org; sidr wg
Subject: Re: [sidr] Interim Meeting Draft Agenda: 04-30-2012 (April 30, 2012)
speaking as regular ol' member
NANOG is meeting in the morning. As we hope to attract operators, we don't
want to overlap. Not to mention nanog's desire to avoid conflicts with their
agenda. And members who go to nanog.
This is as was originally announced.
--Sandy
From:
John Scudder took minutes for both IETF83 sessions in etherpad, which I
uploaded to the proceedings page.
(Note to the wg: the etherpad is a useful way to take mintues, as they are
visible in real time as they are being entered. It is also a collaborative
tool.)
I just uploaded a new version
Before we get too involved in discussing performance and different methods of
measuring performance, I think it is very important to address the features of
what Brian is suggesting;
such as:
what security services are being supplied?
who is involved in the service - where is the service
Answering a response to a statement made as wg chair
wrt:
Brian Dickson [brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com] said on Friday, May 11, 2012 3:44
PM
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Murphy, Sandra
sandra.mur...@sparta.com wrote:
Before we get too involved in discussing performance and different
Brewing where? (Astonishing, would like to hear more.)
--Sandy
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Montgomery,
Douglas [do...@nist.gov]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 11:33 AM
To: Warren Kumari; Christopher Morrow
Cc: Rob
Final versions of minutes are due tomorrow:
2012-05-16 (Wednesday): Proceedings submission corrections cutoff date by 17:00
PT (UTC -7),
If you have any corrections to what was uploaded, get them to the chairs.
--Sandy
___
sidr mailing list
Potential agenda items for the 6 Jun interim meeting.
The agenda needs to be announced two weeks ahead of time, which is next
Wednesday.
Please send suggested topics to the list. Below are two suggestions to spark
the discussion.
(1) AS_PATH
There was one agenda topic that we never directly
the existence of a jabber
log for any day.
--Sandy
From: t.petch [ie...@btconnect.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 4:28 AM
To: Murphy, Sandra; sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] minutes of 30 Apr 2012 interim meeting
Mmmm
The proceedings page still has no link
From: Murphy, Sandra
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 12:30 PM
To: t.petch; sidr@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [sidr] minutes of 30 Apr 2012 interim meeting
Mmm, indeed.
The meeting materials page records that minutes and agenda were uploaded
successfully. So I do not know why
Agenda deadline is Wed 23 Jun (day after tomorrow).
Please send suggestions to the list.
--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Murphy, Sandra
[sandra.mur...@sparta.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16
Melnikov
Cc: sidr@ietf.org; Murphy, Sandra
Subject: Re: [sidr] request for agenda items for interim meeting 6 Jun
On May 22, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Hi WG,
On 22 May 2012, at 07:08, Murphy, Sandra sandra.mur...@sparta.com wrote:
An eagle eye reader points out that the agenda
The authors have stated that they believe that draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-05
Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures is ready for a working group last
call.
The draft can be accessed at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-05 and
Speaking as regular ol' wg member:
Thanks for all of this John. Excellent thoughts.
Philosophically, the thing that makes me worry the most is that we're
cutting out one of BGP's fundamental elements and replacing it with one
which provides only a subset of its semantics. Specific things
Speaking as regular ol' member
I find audio files at
http://www.ietf.org/audio/ietf83/ietf83-241-20120326-1256-pm.mp3
and
http://www.ietf.org/audio/ietf83/ietf83-241-20120328-0855-am.mp3
that work for me.
Are those the files you were trying to access? If not, do these work for you?
I got there
and physically moved after the meeting. It looks like the tools site
has not been updated with the new location.
I'll let the secretariat/tools team know.
--Sandy, speaking as regular ol' member
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Murphy, Sandra
Remember that this wglc ends a week from today.
--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Murphy, Sandra
[sandra.mur...@sparta.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 7:06 PM
To: sidr@ietf.org
Cc: draft
The authors have stated that they believe that draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-06
BGP Prefix Origin Validation is ready for a working group last call.
The draft can be accessed at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-06 and
A reminder of information for the interim meeting scheduled for tomorrow.
The wiki page is
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr/trac/wiki/InterimMeeting20120606
Note that the wiki page is updated with new info.
(Almost) all the following is copied from the updated wiki page.
The webex session
There will only be one co-chair physically present at the interim meeting 6 Jun.
The in-person chair will be busy trying to keep the meeting flowing.
So the in-person chair will not be responsible for jabbering, minutes taking or
webex session hosting.
Some generous volunteers have offered to
The meeting materials will be available at:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2012/06/06/sidr/proceedings.html
--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
For those interested in the outcome of the 06 Jun interim meeting last week,
the audio recording is available at:
https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/lsr.php?AT=pbSP=ECrID=7070277rKey=92b809cece287683
You can playback online or download for local playback - by installing the
webex recording player.
Speaking as a regular ol' wg member:
wrt:
So if both AS 'C' and AS 'G' originate the 10.42.2.0/23 route and
both ROAs may exist, then you have a MOAS event.
The architecture specifically allows there to be multiple ROAs for a single
prefix. That was a deliberate choice from long, long ago.
the AS4_PATH attribute, but dropping the
attribute is expected and just fine.
--Sandy, speaking as regular ol' wg member
From: George, Wes [wesley.geo...@twcable.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 8:22 AM
To: Murphy, Sandra; sidr@ietf.org
Subject: RE: WGLC
: Friday, June 15, 2012 2:42 PM
To: Murphy, Sandra
Cc: George, Wes; sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-06
True in the context of bgpsec. But this is just pfx-validate. Nonetheless, I am
OK with leaving it as an exercise for the implementor -- as Hannes notes
Below are some dates to keep in mind for the upcoming meeting.
The crucial dates for draft submission are:
-00 version drafts must be submitted by 2012-07-09 17:00 PT (UTC -7)
later version drafts must be submitted by 2012-07-16 17:00 PT (UTC -7)
Note that if you are submitting a draft accepted
The sidr chairs made some decisions on a bunch of drafts today. I happen to
have easiest net connectivity, so I'm the one selected to send the messages.
So expect to see a flurry of messages from me, speaking for the triumverate
sidr-chairs.
--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
this work.
This is your last chance, so speak up.
--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Murphy, Sandra
[sandra.mur...@sparta.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 5:27 PM
To: Roque Gagliano (rogaglia); sidr
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
