Re: [SIESTA-L] TBTrans segfaults

2019-03-26 Por tôpico Nick Papior
Hi, No, said line shouldn't be the cause of anything... :( And fdf inputs shouldn't generate a seg-fault. Another try for debugging would be to add full traceback calls: Intel: FFLAGS = -O0 -g -check bounds -traceback Which should be more informative. Also, Intel is notorious for using the

Re: [SIESTA-L] TBTrans segfaults

2019-03-25 Por tôpico Day, Zacharie
Deleting the TBTGF files did not solve the problem. So, my two guesses now are that there is an issue with the compilation of TBTrans (but it's compiled with stock Intel compiler, so I imagine someone else would have run into this) or there is an error in the input code. Would an error in the

Re: [SIESTA-L] TBTrans segfaults

2019-03-09 Por tôpico Nick Papior
Could you please delete all TBTGF* files, and rerun the calculation? Alternatively, see if increasing the eta value helps. Den fre. 8. mar. 2019 kl. 22.02 skrev Day, Zacharie : > Hello, > > A user on my cluster is trying to process something with Siesta 4.0.2 > TBTrans_rep. The process works up

[SIESTA-L] TBTrans segfaults

2019-03-08 Por tôpico Day, Zacharie
Hello, A user on my cluster is trying to process something with Siesta 4.0.2 TBTrans_rep. The process works up until this output: == Projection Region: atoms : [ 183; 244] Projection Region: states: [ 1639; 2172] Tot: 534 Reading