, 22 de febrero de 2019, 19:00
Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
CC: Satoru Tsurumaki , Policy SIG
Asunto: Re: [sig-policy] prop-128-v001: Multihoming not required for ASN
On Feb 21, 2019, at 22:20 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
wrote:
Hi again Satoru, and once more many thanks for the inputs
I support the proposal.
An organization may neither be currently mutihomed, nor intend to be
multihomed in future, rather it just want to peer with a single provider
should be eligible to get an ASN. I understand that the current policy
doesn't force anyone to be actually multihomed in future,
gards,
> Jordi
>
>
>
>
>
> De: en nombre de Satoru Tsurumaki
>
> Fecha: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2019, 12:30
> Para: Policy SIG
> Asunto: Re: [sig-policy] prop-128-v001: Multihoming not required for ASN
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> I am Satoru Tsuru
it back.
Current text is artificial in the sense that already prop-114 expressed. People
can just lie “I will …”.
Regards,
Jordi
De: en nombre de Satoru Tsurumaki
Fecha: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2019, 12:30
Para: Policy SIG
Asunto: Re: [sig-policy] prop-128-v001: Multihoming
Dear Colleagues,
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.
I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-128,
based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals.
Substantial support expressed, subject to not deleting the
"it holds
enero de 2019, 2:28
Para: Policy SIG
Asunto: Re: [sig-policy] prop-128-v001: Multihoming not required for ASN
Hi Jordi,
We updated this requirement after a year-long discussion within the community.
It doesn't enforce you to multi-home but suggests you should in the future. I
don't see
Dear SIG members,
The proposal "prop-128-v001: Multihoming not required for ASN" has been
sent to the Policy SIG for review.
It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 47 in
Daejeon, South Korea on Wednesday, 27 February 2019.
We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on
