Re: [sig-policy] sig-policy Digest, Vol 164, Issue 10

2018-01-30 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Alex Thank you for your response. > In my opinion, any entity got the ipv4 blocks in 103/8 before 14 Sep 2017 should have the same right to use or transfer its blocks like others. I also think that their rights should be respected. But, > Not only the "One-time" thing ,but a long term

Re: [sig-policy] prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy [SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED]

2018-01-30 Thread andrew khoo
we will vote to support this policy. as a practical example, the organisation i work for will be affected by this policy. the organisation (a mobile MVNO) acquired a business in 2016 with a /22 from the 103/8 range with the intention of offering fixed line services. we are seeking to merge the

Re: [sig-policy] prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy [SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED]

2018-01-30 Thread Rajesh Panwala
Dear Team, As statistics suggest, M cases are hardly 2 to 3% of the total delegations. M are the routine business activities, and no one can predict when will it happen . I support the policy. Rajesh Panwala For Smartlink solutions Pvt. Ltd. +91-9227886001 On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:38 PM,