I do not favour IPv6 allocations on “non-nibble” boundaries, I believe that
allocations ought to be made on “nibble” (i.e. 4-bit) boundaries. On that
basis, the next allocation larger than /32 would be /28, not /29.
Address masking and calculation on /29 boundaries will in my view be quite
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:07 AM, HENDERSON MICHAEL, MR
michael.hender...@nzdf.mil.nz wrote:
However, I understand the current situation is that the ‘legacy’ IPv6
address allocation was for smaller allocations within blocks on /29
boundaries, if I read the Proposition correctly.
As a special
