Re: [sig-policy] prop-128-v001: Multihoming not required for ASN

2019-02-21 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Hi again Satoru, and once more many thanks for the inputs, If we keep “it holds previously-allocated provider independent address space”, then it means an organization, for example, deploying only IPv6, will not be able to get an ASN. Or even an organization willing to get IPv4, can’t get

Re: [sig-policy] Version 3 - prop-126 PDP Update

2019-02-21 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Hi Satoru, and again thanks a lot for the inputs, Let me try to explain this. The PDP is by definition a community matter. The AMM is a smaller subset than the community, which in turn is represented by the EC. In a bottom-up approach, it doesn’t make sense that a decision taken by

Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-version 5: Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

2019-02-21 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Dear Satoru, all, First of all, thanks a lot for your inputs! Let me try to clarify this. The text of the problem statement has been the same (maybe minor variations) across the 4 previous versions, so it is difficult to understand what is not clear now, which can have been addressed

Re: [sig-policy] prop-129-v001: Abolish Waiting list for unmet IPv4 requests

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-129, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Substantial support expressed for the proposal with the reason that as pointe

Re: [sig-policy] prop-128-v001: Multihoming not required for ASN

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-128, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Substantial support expressed, subject to not deleting the "it holds previous

Re: [sig-policy] Prop-127 announcement : Change maximum delegation size of 103/8 IPv4 address, pool to a /23

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-127, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Almost half of participants were oppose the proposal and almost other half wa

Re: [sig-policy] Version 3 - prop-126 PDP Update

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-126, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a supporting for the proposal. But a few opposing

Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-version 5: Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-124, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a neutral for the proposal with reasons that the