Hi Paul,
Then it seems there is a misunderstanding, at least in the way I interpreted
what it was said in the meeting.
For me it is not just editorial changes, because there is not a link, in
between the PDP and the guidelines. It is not a matter of just "adding" that
link now. It is a matter
Dear Jordi, and colleagues,
This policy document review is on the Secretariat workplan for 2020, and
it has been regarded as an editorial task, on an assumption that it will
not affect the substance of any policies.
Of course, any document changes would be subject to the usual editorial
review
Hi Jordi,
Thanks for your suggestion. Secretariat will consult with the APNIC EC.
Regards
Sunny
On 24/02/2020 8:53 pm, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> Hi Bertrand, all,
>
> As indicated in the meeting, the withdraw of this proposal is "temporary", in
> view of the commitment from the
Hi Bertrand, all,
As indicated in the meeting, the withdraw of this proposal is "temporary", in
view of the commitment from the EC/secretariat to review the discrepancies in
the actual PDP and SIG guidelines, assuming that this will be brought back to
the community, following the
Dear colleagues
Version 2 of prop-134: PDP Update, did not reach consensus and was
withdrawn by the author at the APNIC 49 Open Policy Meeting.
Proposal details, including the full text of the proposal, history, and
links to previous versions are available at:
