Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #689458]: Vision class missing in sikulixapi-2.0.4.jar

2020-03-23 Thread Selva
Question #689458 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/689458 Selva confirmed that the question is solved: Thanks RaiMan, that solved my question. -- You received this question notification because your team Sikuli Drivers is an answer contact for Sikuli.

Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #689458]: Vision class missing in sikulixapi-2.0.4.jar

2020-03-23 Thread Selva
Question #689458 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/689458 Status: Open => Solved Selva confirmed that the question is solved: I am closing this . Looks there is an issue in the order of jar in classpath. workign fine when I add this as first item in class

Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #689350]: SikuliX IDE is disappering on RUN

2020-03-23 Thread Nitin Chaudhari
Question #689350 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/689350 Nitin Chaudhari posted a new comment: Thanks Raiman, Benjamin. I shall try as suggested. And let you now if am facing any issues. Regards, Nitin Chaudhari -- You received this question notification

Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #689458]: Vision class missing in sikulixapi-2.0.4.jar

2020-03-23 Thread Selva
Question #689458 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/689458 Status: Answered => Open Selva is still having a problem: Hi RaiMan, Thanks for the update. I have commnted out the above feature. But I am having issue on just simple click on screen image like

Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #689458]: Vision class missing in sikulixapi-2.0.4.jar

2020-03-23 Thread RaiMan
Question #689458 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/689458 Status: Open => Answered RaiMan proposed the following answer: A class Vision does no longer exist, since everything OpenCV related is now implemented at the Java level. The above feature does not make

[Sikuli-driver] [Bug 1867074] Re: [2.0.3] Do.popAsk return incorrect on timeout --- fixed in 2.0.4

2020-03-23 Thread Jon Scharff
Sounds good to me. Thanks again ^_^ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is subscribed to Sikuli. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867074 Title: [2.0.3] Do.popAsk return incorrect on timeout --- fixed in 2.0.4 Status in Sikuli: Fix

[Sikuli-driver] [Question #689458]: Vision class missing in sikulixapi-2.0.4.jar

2020-03-23 Thread Selva
New question #689458 on Sikuli: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/689458 we used old sikulixapi.jar for longtime and forced to use the latest own. While importing the latest jar - sikulixapi-2.0.4.jar, we face issue on the following import org.sikuli.natives.Vision; This Vision

Re: [Sikuli-driver] [Question #689445]: corretto 11 jdk cant run sikuli

2020-03-23 Thread RaiMan
Question #689445 on Sikuli changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/689445 Status: Open => Answered RaiMan proposed the following answer: Sorry, too special environment (What the hell is Coretto?) Seams to be some incompatibility between whatever. Has surely nothing to do

[Sikuli-driver] [Bug 1867074] Re: [2.0.3] Do.popAsk return incorrect on timeout --- fixed in 2.0.4

2020-03-23 Thread RaiMan
Just checked/tested and had a look at other related requests/bugs: As said in the docs for the timed pop... variants: if the feature times out (user does nothing), then None/null is returned. If the buttons Yes/No are pressed, True/False respectively is returned. Closing the dialog using the

[Sikuli-driver] [Bug 1867074] Re: [2.0.3] Do.popAsk return incorrect on timeout --- fixed in 2.0.4

2020-03-23 Thread RaiMan
Thanks for feedback. No need to do anything on your side. I will check and do what is needed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is subscribed to Sikuli. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867074 Title: [2.0.3] Do.popAsk return incorrect on

[Sikuli-driver] [Bug 1867074] Re: [2.0.3] Do.popAsk return incorrect on timeout --- fixed in 2.0.4

2020-03-23 Thread Jon Scharff
Thank you for your quick response. I've finally gotten then change to check the change, and for my usage, it now works the same way it did in 1.4.1. There is still a difference when you click the upper right x button on the popup, though. In 1.4.1, this would return 0(False), whereas in 2.0.4 it