Re: [silk] This is what the Singularity looks like.

2016-04-18 Thread Thaths
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:33 PM Thaths wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Udhay Shankar N wrote: > >> >> http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25068-wikipediasize-maths-proof-too-big-for-humans-to-check.html >> >> Wikipedia-size maths proof too big for

Re: [silk] This is what the Singularity looks like.

2014-04-23 Thread Pranesh Prakash
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Udhay Shankar N ud...@pobox.com wrote: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25068-wikipediasize-maths-proof-too-big-for-humans-to-check.html I present an anti-thesis: http://www.dilbert.com/blog/entry/how_the_robots_will_take_over/

Re: [silk] This is what the Singularity looks like.

2014-02-18 Thread Thaths
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Udhay Shankar N ud...@pobox.com wrote: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25068-wikipediasize-maths-proof-too-big-for-humans-to-check.html Wikipedia-size maths proof too big for humans to check 17:38 17 February 2014 by Jacob Aron If no human can

Re: [silk] This is what the Singularity looks like.

2014-02-18 Thread Shenoy N
On 19 February 2014 09:03, Thaths tha...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Udhay Shankar N ud...@pobox.com wrote: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25068-wikipediasize-maths-proof-too-big-for-humans-to-check.html Wikipedia-size maths proof too big for humans to