On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:33 PM Thaths wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
>
>>
>> http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25068-wikipediasize-maths-proof-too-big-for-humans-to-check.html
>>
>> Wikipedia-size maths proof too big for
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Udhay Shankar N ud...@pobox.com wrote:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25068-wikipediasize-maths-proof-too-big-for-humans-to-check.html
I present an anti-thesis:
http://www.dilbert.com/blog/entry/how_the_robots_will_take_over/
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Udhay Shankar N ud...@pobox.com wrote:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25068-wikipediasize-maths-proof-too-big-for-humans-to-check.html
Wikipedia-size maths proof too big for humans to check
17:38 17 February 2014 by Jacob Aron
If no human can
On 19 February 2014 09:03, Thaths tha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Udhay Shankar N ud...@pobox.com wrote:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25068-wikipediasize-maths-proof-too-big-for-humans-to-check.html
Wikipedia-size maths proof too big for humans to