On Monday 12 Feb 2007 2:26 pm, Charles Haynes wrote:
I would prefer a doctor that had at least seen bleeding piles before I
would consider going to them for treatment. Reading about piles in a
book is all fine and good, but I would hope a doctor got more than
just book training before
On Friday 09 Feb 2007 10:46 am, Srini Ramakrishnan wrote:
Kupa is a Well, manduka is a frog. This is the story of a frog, which
I'm not sure if it applies here...
For the anglophones - Kupa Manduka means blinkers or tunnel vision
It does apply in a nuanced sense to the people I am addressing
On 2/3/07, shiv sastry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have said on and off that I had been working on a book about Pakistan. A
couple of silklisters have seen early drafts of the book.
The book is now online as a freely downloadable and distributable ebook on
i downloaded it, and i skimmed through a few chapters... admittedly i
didnt read it from cover to cover. my preliminary opinion was this:
-the book had a significant taint of bias
-the writer has not traveled to pakistan, but collected an
aggregation of largely (negative) journalistic opinions
Thanks for your comments.
I did what I thought needed to be done. But regarding the haven't travelled
to Pakistan - one needs to recall that a doctor does not have to suffer from
a brain tumor or bleeding piles to treat those conditions. That is the basic
premise of a review of the
Yes doc but a terminal disease and an independent country are two
different matters... the first can probably be looked at objectively
and scientifically (in terms of available technical medical
literature...) and cannot be compared in any sense with what mr.vir
sanghvi has to say about a
On 2/9/07, Abhishek Hazra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one needs to recall that a doctor does not have to suffer from
a brain tumor or bleeding piles to treat those conditions
Marc Bloch: a historian needs thicker boots and thinner notebooks
I've not yet read the book Shiv, I've only skimmed
