Re: [silk] Spammer attack

2020-08-28 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
It is trivially broken but well, let me enable it when I have some time --srs On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 7:38 PM +0530, "Hari Selvarajan" wrote: > Some spammer seems to have discovered the mailman instance that runs >

Re: [silk] Spammer attack

2020-08-28 Thread Hari Selvarajan
> Some spammer seems to have discovered the mailman instance that runs > silklist. I am getting ~50 new member requests per day which I am manually > deleting. FML. > Apparently[1] mailman, from around version 2.1.26, has Google reCAPTCHA support. Is enabling that an option? — Hari [1]

Re: [silk] Spammer attack

2020-08-28 Thread Tomasz Rola
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 05:25:32AM -0700, Thaths wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020, 8:57 PM Radhika, Y. wrote: > > > Time to go to Silk on FB, for me. > > > > Why? Are there no Russian disinformation bots there? Well, if fake book is for communications exchange then drinking 95% spirit is a

Re: [silk] Spammer attack

2020-08-28 Thread Tomasz Rola
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 08:34:05AM +0530, Udhay Shankar N wrote: > Some spammer seems to have discovered the mailman instance that runs > silklist. I am getting ~50 new member requests per day which I am manually > deleting. FML. Udhay, Can it be done so that mailman says: "thank you, now please

Re: [silk] Spammer attack

2020-08-28 Thread Thaths
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020, 8:57 PM Radhika, Y. wrote: > Time to go to Silk on FB, for me. > Why? Are there no Russian disinformation bots there? Thaths > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 8:04 PM Udhay Shankar N wrote: > > > Some spammer seems to have discovered the mailman instance that runs > >