-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Silklisters,
What do you folks generally prefer: PGP/MIME or inline PGP? My
observations are that usage of PGP/MIME makes it more difficult to
locate messages with attachments in clients that don't grok it (or most
webmail), inline PGP, otoh,
Pranesh Prakash [07/05/10 00:49 +0530]:
Is there a general rule of thumb that you've set for yourself as to when
you use one or the other? I'm currently experimenting with inline PGP
with my Gmail account, instead of PGP/MIME.
I dont use pgp for everything under the sun. Where I do use it (in
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote, [on 5/7/2010 6:49 AM]:
I hardly ever sign my email .. what's not worth encrypting is almost always
not worth signing either.
More deniability too. :)
Udhay
--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))
Udhay Shankar N [07/05/10 06:59 +0530]:
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote, [on 5/7/2010 6:49 AM]:
I hardly ever sign my email .. what's not worth encrypting is almost always
not worth signing either.
More deniability too. :)
Nah. More than enough tells .. hardly anybody at all sends from
