http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nn4050744
Karl Becker kwbecker...@gmail.com wrote: Came across this article about
research showing nano silver particles being harmful to human cells.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140227115424.htm
===
Jim Holmes wrote: Because of the possibility of human exposure to
...@cox.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CSResearch into nano silver shows it's harmful to humans
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:54:45 -0700
Karl Becker kwbecker...@gmail.com
wrote: Came across this article about research showing nano silver particles
being harmful to human cells
Because of the possibility of human exposure to nanoparticles, there is an
urgent need to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the cellular
responses
* that might be triggered.*
More pharmacrook scare crap.
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Karl Becker kwbecker...@gmail.com wrote:
it is too early to say anything. we know that 'colloidal' silver is GOOD. nano
is something else, still unknown. but big pharma will jump at any opportunity
to demonize silver. it is enough to use the words 'silver' and 'free radicals'
a few times for people to make the wrong association.
Yep, kick any bush and an establishment stooge will run out with a brief case
full of their misleading and misinformation crap.
N.
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 16:42:06 -0700
Subject: Re: CSResearch into nano silver shows it's harmful to humans
From: gooogleis...@gmail.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
6 matches
Mail list logo
