That's not a skeptic.
Believer [or Anti Believer...same thing] by default?
But like my Dad says about UFOs...unless they help or interfere with
putting food on the table, whether or not they exist doesn't mattergot
better things to do with my time.
Ode
We already have a fine
A true skeptic is a non believer.
Most are really *anti* believers no different from their opposition,
neither of which closely examines beliefs and both of which bolsters them
with exclusion of all that doesn't apply.
ode
At 06:06 PM 6/21/2010 -0400, you wrote:
You put it directly, I
Now *that* is a very well thought out, reasoned argument, and worthy of being
taken on board. I bet it won't be in some quarters though. dee
On 21 Jun 2010, at 23:37, Jason R Eaton wrote:
Hi Bodhisattva:
Your remarks are (and quite classically) very prejudicial. Skeptics are not
You might state that you enjoy it, but you don't actually *listen* to any of it
though! The only opinion you seem to take any notice of is your own, or
someone who agrees with you. That doesn't strike me as being open minded. dee
On 21 Jun 2010, at 23:56, bodhisattva wrote:
This isn't
I think this is ridiculous. To be a sceptic means to question things, not to
dismiss things out of hand. I question things--which means everything I'm
told, and then if it turns out to be true or correct, then I will take it on
board. This is the opposite of blindly following what you are
And hopefully, Dee will soon reach my post reqeusting that we end this
topic, and stop responding to it!? evil grin
In the meantime, everybody please refrain from responding to Dee's
posts!
Thank you.
Mike
I think this is ridiculous. To be a sceptic means to question things,
not to
Ode
In my neck of the woods that is known as being solid ( not gullible). CS is
real , you can see it and you can feel it's benefits.
Dave
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Ode Coyote odecoy...@windstream.netwrote:
That's not a skeptic.
Believer [or Anti Believer...same thing] by default?
You put it directly, I said the same thing nicely. Basically, skeptics
are 'dead energy', nothing moves either way, nothing happens.
Jane MacRoss wrote:
I have found skeptics to be basically fence sitters which means they
are usually pains in the A*se whereas I walk a razor's edged path so
Jane
My answer to that is jump off the razor edge on the side of proven protocol
and give your feet a rest.
Of course looking on the other side to see if you missed anything good now
and then should be less perplexing. I don't even look anymore, If I hadn't
seen anything in the past 75 years it
@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: Skeptics was // Re: CSMagnesium Oxide Prill Beads - 20 June
You put it directly, I said the same thing nicely. Basically, skeptics
are 'dead energy', nothing moves either way, nothing happens.
Jane MacRoss wrote:
I have found skeptics
This isn't relevant at all, since I clearly state - I ENJOY inquiry and
investigation, and encourage it. That's healthy, but that's not
skepticism, which is not careful, rational, and intuitive
study/investigation/exploration/trial, but an extreme of such to the
point that outcomes are often
!~
- Original Message -
From: Jason R Eaton resea...@silvermedicine.org
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: Skeptics was // Re: CSMagnesium Oxide Prill Beads - 20 June
Hi Bodhisattva:
Your remarks are (and quite classically) very prejudicial. Skeptics
Jason, don't most so-called skeptics dismiss colloidal silver as quackery?
Alan
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Jason R Eaton
resea...@silvermedicine.orgwrote:
Hi Bodhisattva:
Your remarks are (and quite classically) very prejudicial. Skeptics are
not armchair philosophers. They are
I'll answer, you are right, almost /*all */skeptic sites state colloidal
silver is quackery.
http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/PhonyAds/silverad.html
*Colloidal Silver: Risk Without Benefit*
http://www.ntskeptics.org/2001/2001november/november2001.htm
*Hi-Yo, Colloidal Silver!*
.
Best Regards,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: Alan Jones
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: Skeptics was // Re: CSMagnesium Oxide Prill Beads - 20 June
Jason, don't most so-called skeptics dismiss colloidal silver as quackery
@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Skeptics was // Re: CSMagnesium Oxide Prill Beads - 20 June
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:31:17 -0700
\Hi Alan:
Not at all... Sites such as Quackwatch, et al. aren't run by skeptics, they
are run by individuals posing as some sort of authority.
A skeptic, by definition
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: Skeptics was // Re: CSMagnesium Oxide Prill Beads - 20 June
Jason, don't most so-called skeptics dismiss colloidal silver as quackery?
Alan
17 matches
Mail list logo
