From: Matt Mahoney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- John G. Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there really a bit per synapse? Is representing a synapse with a
bit an
accurate enough simulation? One synapse is a very complicated system.
A typical neural network simulation uses several bits
Matt Mahoney wrote:
--- John G. Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there really a bit per synapse? Is representing a synapse with a bit an
accurate enough simulation? One synapse is a very complicated system.
A typical neural network simulation uses several bits per synapse. A Hopfield
net
Matt Mahoney wrote:
--- Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Mahoney wrote:
--- John G. Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there really a bit per synapse? Is representing a synapse with a bit
an
accurate enough simulation? One synapse is a very complicated system.
A typical
--- Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Mahoney wrote:
--- John G. Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there really a bit per synapse? Is representing a synapse with a bit
an
accurate enough simulation? One synapse is a very complicated system.
A typical neural network
--- Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Mahoney wrote:
I was referring to Landauer's estimate of long term memory learning rate
of
about 2 bits per second. http://www.merkle.com/humanMemory.html
This does not include procedural memory, things like visual perception and
Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[For those not familiar with Richard's style: once he disagrees with something
he will dispute it to the bitter end in long, drawn out arguments, because
nothing is more important than being right.]
What's the purpose for this comment? If the people here
--- Eric B. Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[For those not familiar with Richard's style: once he disagrees with
something
he will dispute it to the bitter end in long, drawn out arguments, because
nothing is more important than being right.]
