Hi,
RFC 3261 Says that 400 Bad Request should be formed if there is an error
in Mandatory headers like To,From,Via and Callid etc or if the Mandatory
headers are missing.
Can someone tell me how to form the 400 message with these malformed headers?
Regards,
Srikanth.
Hey Venkat,
This looks more like an application problem, rather than SIP protocol
problem. Is it possible for the application that is reading the bindings
from the registration database to play IVR based on the domain/host
instead of username?
Ashish
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
This is a very good question - one I too have wondered about and don't
know the answer to.
I speculate that the best one could do is to replicate the headers in
the response and hope for the best. The most troublesome one is probably
Via. You really have to be able to interpret that to know
Hi all,
Any idea why/how draft-ietf-simple-rpid-10 can make direct references to
XML elements defined within draft-ietf-simple-presence-data-model-06
without actually including ...presence-data-model-06 as a normative
reference?
See the top of Section 3.1 (... they either extend tuple,
You need the SIP via header to send the message back to where it came
from.
Approach 1: If the via header is fine then use the other (may be
incomplete) headers to create 400 and send it based on via header.
Approach 2: If the via header is not okay to be used for a reply then
you can also drop
Hi,
Has anyone implemented a SIP app that uses the Digest algorithm with
qop=auth-int ?
in RFC 2617 A2 is defined as H(entity-body)
However content-length is defined as length of message-body but not
including the CRLF
so while computing A2, do we keep or ignore the CRLF's ?
It seems
Hi,
I have 2 IP phones (1 Cisco 7960 another IP phone, say IP phone A)
registered with fwd.pulver.com. When calling Cisco from IP phone A, I
noticed that the INVITE which Cisco received that 2 equal Record-Route
values. It probably is 'cause of the fact that the INVITE contained 2
VIA field
