RE: [Sip-implementors] 183 Session Progress with SDP

2005-05-19 Thread Shawn Lewis
That is not PDD. PDD is time from the iNVITE to any of the following: CANCEL 180 183 2xx 3xx 4xx 5xx Response. So the time between the invite and the 183 is your PDD. The 23 seconds you mention, is how long the phone rangor the time between your 183 and the 200 is your ring time.

RE: [Sip-implementors] RE: softphone for Video

2005-04-06 Thread Shawn Lewis
How about a video capable softphone for Windows? Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rinchen Tundup Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 11:18 PM To: ira kadin Cc: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

RE: [Sip-implementors] Calling Party Name

2004-09-30 Thread Shawn Lewis
The issue may not be with the gateway, but actually with the PRI service from your provider. Some switched support multiple methods, or not support delivery of calling name in the message. Many times before a switch will finally deliver the call, they do what is called a CNAM lookup and use that

RE: [Sip-implementors] Sip client behavior on non-reception of RTPframes

2003-07-01 Thread Shawn Lewis
Some implementations will look for RTCP going away, as this is constant, and RTP is not. Shawn _ President/CEO Volo Communications, Inc http://www.volocommunications.com (p) 407-389-3232 / (f) 407-389-3233 [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email