Dear all,
Can anyone tell me how to validate the following test scenario?
Scenario:
If an unreliable transport is used,ensure that the IUT,when an INVITE
server transaction is in the Confirmed state enters into the terminated state
after timer I set to T4 value expires.
After
Hello all,
Can any one help me to differentiate the below two scenarios?
1.If the Request-URI indicates a resource at this proxy that does notexist, the
proxy MUST return a 404 (Not Found) response.
a. Proxy receives invite sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
b. Proxy is responsible for biloxy
Hello all,
1.What is the significance of maddr parameter in request URI?
2.Can any one explain what is set of address and domain proxy is responsible
for in maddr?
If the Request-URI contains a maddr parameter, the proxy MUST check to see if
its value is in the set of addresses or domains
Explanation please
Thanks in advance
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 6/22/2005 6:51 PM
To: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Proxy Request processing - Maddr processing -3261
Hello all,
1.What is
Hello,
As per RFC 3261
If the initial offer is in an INVITE, the answer MUST be in a reliable
non-failure message from UAS back to UAC which is correlated to that INVITE.
For this specification, that is only the final 2xx response to that INVITE.
That same exact answer MAY also be placed in
Dear all,
What does low-layer security mechanisms for SIP means as per RFC 3261 section
26.2 Security Mechanisms?How this is achieved?
Thanks and Regds
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
this message are intended
for
Hello all,
RFC 3261 says Before a request is sent, the client transport MUST insert a
value of the sent-by field with FQDN or IP and Port into the Via header field.
I dont see an UAC inserting a sent-by in the VIA header.Normally a VIA header
would look like this,
INVITE sip:[EMAIL
An explanation for the below would be appreciated.
Thanks
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 5/17/2005 2:42 PM
To: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] maddr parameter processing - RFC 3261
Dear all,
I
Dear all,
Scenario 1:
1.UAC sends Invite to UAS creating a Client transaction.
2.UAS receives Invite and responds with 200 OK
3.UAC transaction receives 200OK and pass it on to UAC core.
4.Now who is responsible for generation of ACK? Is it done by UAC core by
creating
Dear all,
Can any one give an example of passing different q values in the register
request for multiple contact header values?
How the priority of the contact list is arrived based on this q parameter when
received in a 3xx response either by proxies or UAC?
Thanks in advance
Dear all,
As per section 8.2.6.2 of RFC 3261 ,it is mandatory that an UAS
receiving INVITE request with a TAG set on the To header responds with a
Success(200 OK) or a provisional response including the same URI and the same
TAG for the to header.
But when I was trying
Paul
I suppose invite is the only way to create a Dialog as per RFC 3261.
In that case below scenario is applicable only to re-invite sent in the same
dialog context. Right..
Thanks again
From: Paliakkara, Geo Paul (Geo) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue
Hi all,
According to 13.3.1.3 and 21.4.13 of RFC 3261 I need a clarification of
what exactly it means that an INVITE request including a session description
that it can understand but it can not accept
Can anyone explain it in detail with simple example?
Thanks,
regards,
geetha
Dear all,
There are quite a few implementation claim to support SIP based conferencing
both commercial and free.
Are the follwing specs cater to the needs of SIP based conferencing? Is there
any other Specifications?
* draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-06
*
hello,
Suppose A is calling B and B keeps A on hold. B sends INVITE with the
connection address containing 0.0.0.0.But when A sends 200 Ok to B it sends
with its own connection address but not 0.0.0.0. is it a correct behaviour of A?
regards,
sangeetha
Confidentiality Notice
The
Hi,
Yes it is re-invite.
The objective is to put the A party on hold by sending Connection address as
0.0.0.0 in a re-invite.
But the A party while replying with 200OK does not reply with 0.0.0.0 in the
SDP.(Is this the right behavior of A on receiving 0.0.0.0 in re-invite)
Regds
Dear all,
Can any one suggest a UA that supports REFER method for download?
Does cisco IP Phones,MSN support REFER?
Regds
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
this message are intended
for the exclusive use of the
Dear all,
Any example or explanation for the below statement from
draft-ietf-sip-session-timer-15.txt would be appreciated.
The proxy computes the session expiration as the time when the 2xx
response is forwarded upstream, plus the session interval. This
session expiration MUST
Dear all,
If an UAS having sent 200OK for a session refresh request with a session
expires header value as 3600 sec and refresher param as UAC will close the call
if it did not receive a session refresh request at seconds?
How does UAS decides on the seconds?
Thanks in Advance
Hello,
Can any one give an example for
When a notifier receives a subscription refresh, assuming that the
Subscriber is still authorized, the notifier updates the expiration
time for the subscription. As with the initial subscription, the
server MAY shorten the amount of time
Hello all,
When a SUBSCRIBE NOTIFY are being sent in an already established dialog context
by INVITE.
What happens to the SUBSCRIBE-NOTIFY requests if the existing dialog gets
terminated by an unexpected bye?
Regds
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this electronic
21 matches
Mail list logo
