Hi, Yes it is re-invite.
The objective is to put the A party on hold by sending Connection address as 0.0.0.0 in a re-invite. But the A party while replying with 200OK does not reply with 0.0.0.0 in the SDP.(Is this the right behavior of A on receiving 0.0.0.0 in re-invite) Regds ________________________________ From: Muthu Arul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 3/21/2005 9:09 PM To: Innovation Interops Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] reg draft-ietf-sipping-services-examples-08-consultation hold)(sec 2.2) Do you mean re-INVITE (the term putting 'on hold' makes sense only for an established session) ? Though it is no longer recommended, A's behaviour seem OK, as far as the port number in its answer is non-zero. Excerpt from RFC 3264: "An agent MUST be capable of receiving SDP with a connection address of 0.0.0.0, in which case it means that neither RTP nor RTCP should be sent to the peer." Muthu On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:03:12 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hello, > > Suppose A is calling B and B keeps A on hold. B sends INVITE with the > connection address containing 0.0.0.0.But when A sends 200 Ok to B it > sends with its own connection address but not 0.0.0.0. is it a correct > behaviour of A? > > regards, > sangeetha > > Confidentiality Notice > > The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to > this message are intended > for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or > privileged information. If > you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or > [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately > and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors > Confidentiality Notice The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
