PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 6:46 PM
To: Singh, Indresh; sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 183 Session Progress with SDP
Hi,
Thank you Indresh for your response. I agree with you that we should not
be billing early until a connection has been established
Thanks for the clarification!
- Original Message -
From: Shawn Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pong Cavan [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Singh, Indresh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 6:01 PM
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] 183 Session Progress with SDP
: Thursday, May 19, 2005 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 183 Session Progress with SDP
Pong,
I was going to ask you why the long delay between the 183 and 200 !,
I guess you beat me to it.
The trace is helpful but doesn't explain the delay. The field Resent
Packet: False might not mean
Dear Sirs,
I am a newbie and please forgive me if this post does not below in this list.
I have a question that I hope you might be able to clarify for me. Gateway A
sends an INVITE to Gateway B with SDP. When B sends back 183 Session Progress
with SDP, shouldn't A respond and use the
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pong Cavan
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 4:13 PM
To: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] 183 Session Progress with SDP
Dear Sirs,
I am a newbie and please forgive me if this post does not below in this
list. I have a question that I hope
-Length: 0
- Original Message -
From: Singh, Indresh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Pong Cavan' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 4:41 PM
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] 183 Session Progress with SDP
It depends upon what is carried in the 183 SDP.
Let
, May 19, 2005 6:46 PM
To: Singh, Indresh; sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 183 Session Progress with SDP
Hi,
Thank you Indresh for your response. I agree with you that we should not
be billing early until a connection has been established. During this call
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 0
- Original Message -
From: Singh, Indresh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Pong Cavan' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 4:41 PM
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] 183 Session Progress with SDP
It depends upon
