Hi all,
The package creation is based on the kernel version shipped with Debian. I
do not want to change the kernel by default. It is the approach selected by
Dann and i think it is the best one. Debian developers spend a lot of time
to ship a kernel coherent for the distribution, i think it is a
Hi all,
I perfectly understand your position but as i said before, it seems to me
that this is the procedure selected by Dann (but maybe i missed something).
I do not disagree with that approach (keeping the same kernel for
everything) and Dann did a great job in creating scripts to ease the
crea
0, 2006 at 01:46:23PM -0500, geoffroy vallee wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I started to port systemimager 3.7.5 on Debian sarge based on the
> systemimager-debian repository. Please, find in attachment my first
> patches/files.
> The modifications allow one to create all standard packages
changelog (revision 3)
@@ -1,2 +1,8 @@
+systemimager (3.7.6-0gv1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * New upstream release
+
+ -- Geoffroy Vallee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:23:49 -0500
+
systemimager (3.7.5-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
Hi all,
A small patch for systemimager-debian. This patch allows one to create
binary packages on both Debian unstable and stable.
Index: control.in
===
--- control.in (revision 1)
+++ control.in (revision 7)
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Secti
Hi all,
In order to create packages for systemimager-3.8.0, i had to use the
following files, which are not in systemimager-debian's trunk
LVM2.2.02.18.tgz
device-mapper.1.02.17.tgz
Thanks,
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influe
Hi all,
A little patch that allows one to compile LVM2.02.18 without error
Index: control.in
===
--- control.in (revision 7)
+++ control.in (revision 10)
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: admin
Priority: optional
Maintainer: dann frazier <
Hi all,
I tried to send this message during the week-end but i did not see appear on
the mailing-list so i resend it... sorry if you receive it multiple times.
A small patch for systemimager-debian. This patch allows one to create
binary packages on both Debian unstable and stable.
Index: contr
Mar 25, 2007 at 06:04:32PM -0400, geoffroy vallee wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A small patch for systemimager-debian. This patch allows one to create
> binary packages on both Debian unstable and stable.
>
> Index: control.in
> =
I think Dann prefers to have patches inline...
2007/3/28, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Perhaps instead of sending the patch in-line, send them as an attachment.
Would that help?
Cheers,
Bernard
On 3/28/07, geoffroy vallee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dann,
>
&
Hi all,
First patch for the creation of Debian packages that match the set of RPMs.
This first patch only concerns the file debian/control.arch.in, i will send
a patch for debian/control.in and then debian/rules if this one is acceptable.
Note that i changed the name of the existing package (i.e.
Hi all,
Before to tag a new version, can someone update the files for the Debian
package (changelog)? That will allow us to have up-to-date Debian packages at
the same time.
Thanks,
On Monday 23 April 2007 06:32, Erich Focht wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> I will tag the 2.2.9 release today and put it
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 05:00, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Moreover, I wasn't able to follow all the details about the Debian efforts
> (even if I hope to be able to contribute soon), but (at least) I'd like to
> say a big *thank you* to Dann and Geoffoy. There're a lot of requests for
> the Debian/Ubun
On Friday 25 May 2007 01:03, you wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 01:00:11AM -0400, Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
> > On Friday 25 May 2007 00:01, you wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:34:40AM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> >
On Friday 25 May 2007 00:01, you wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:34:40AM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If python2.4-dev is not installed, it is not possible to create the
> > Debian packages. Therefore i added a build dependence with python2.4-dev.
> > The patch is also availabl
On Thursday 31 May 2007 19:30, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:05:16AM -0500,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: valleegr
> > Date: 2007-05-31 10:05:13 -0500 (Thu, 31 May 2007)
> > New Revision: 86
> >
> > Modified:
> >branches/gvallee-3.8/debian/control.in
> > Log:
> > Add
Piotr,
Did you check if iptables do block by default multicast UDP traffic ?
Regards,
On Saturday 07 July 2007 06:53, Piotr Bratek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to install OSCAR on my 6node cluster. I use Fedora Core 5
> and Oscar version 5.0 It seems to install on the server node without
> is
On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Bernard Li wrote:
> Of course, Geoffroy needs to move his files to the new repository first.
I do not even know if i have write access to the SIS repository for
systemconfigurator and i think Erich did move everything. So do whatever you
want, i will check what is
s before
> taking over ownership of the package to assure a smooth transition -
> its becoming clear that this is unlikely to happen anytime soon.
>
> There has been some work towards packaging a newer release, mostly
> from Geoffroy Vallee. This work is available on upstream'
On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:23:35PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote:
> > Hi Dann,
> >
> > The problem is that initrd-template is a arch independent package but
> > does include ELF binaries. The package must be (i think) arch independent
> > (it may be u
On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > Geoffroy Valle'e wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> >
> > Hi Geoffroy,
> >
> > > I had a quick look at the Debian packages using trunk, on x86_64. It
> > > looks pretty good. The only issues i saw
On Saturday 13 October 2007, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
> > On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> >>> Geoffroy Valle'e wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >
On Saturday 13 October 2007, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
> > On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:23:35PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote:
> >>> Hi Dann,
> >>>
> >>> The problem is
Hi all,
In trunk all the init scripts are included into Debian packages with the
--no-start option. I agree that it fixes few issues but do we really want users
to manually start the daemons (because i guess that at the end they will have to
do so)?
Just a question i asked to myself comparing De
Hi all,
I saw a problem with SystemConfigurator: the Debian changelog
(debian/changelog) for SystemConfigurator-2.2.10 (tags/sc_2.2.10) is not
up-to-date. As a result the generated Debian packages from the tag has a
wrong version (2.2.9) which may be confusing for users (i think we can even
ca
Something similar but based on OSCAR (so ultimately on SIS):
http://www.csm.ornl.gov/srt/oscarv.html
This is not yet directly included into OSCAR since some features are
still missing for the virtualization support. Therefore this is still an
"experimental" project.
Regards,
On Mon, 2007-11-05 a
Hello,
I just checked-in a patch that should fix the problem. If someone thinks
my patch is not good, please speak up i will revert it.
Best regards,
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 11:21 -0600, Eric Ross wrote:
> I am trying to build debs using the latest code from subversion, and I
> encounter this err
:
> Hi Geoffroy:
>
> On 12/3/07, Geoffroy Vallee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I just checked-in a patch that should fix the problem. If someone thinks
> > my patch is not good, please speak up i will revert it.
>
> Thanks for the fix -- do you mind merging t
Hi all,
Few questions about systemconfiguration:
- systemconfigurator-2.2.11 has been released but no tags exist in SVN.
The latest tag in 2.2.10-2. Is it normal?
- for Debian packages, the Debian changelog includes the
systemconfigurator changelog and the changelog at the top directory is
out-of-
x the debian
> changelog issues?
>
> Thanks,
> best regards,
> Erich
>
> On Monday 17 December 2007 22:03, Geoffroy Vallee wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Few questions about systemconfiguration:
> > - systemconfigurator-2.2.11 has been released but no
Hi,
Before to check-in this fix, i would like to check-in the attached patch which
fixes errors with the Debian package.
May i check-in these modifications into trunk?
Regards,
Quoting Geoffroy Vallee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sure i think i have a write access. Will try to fix that
Hi all,
Ferrol has been working on the extension of SystemImager for a diskless
support. He did a pretty good job, the implementation being not intrusive.
Please find a description of the modification, a patch for si_prepareclient and
a new Perl module for SystemImager that actually implements
Hi Bernard,
We will be happy to use trac as you suggested but the URL you give does not
work (server down).
Let me know when the server will be back online.
Regards,
- Mail Original -
De: "Bernard Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À: "geoffroy vallee" <[EMAIL
]>
À: sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: "geoffroy vallee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Juillet 2008 05:02:23 GMT -05:00 USA/Canada - États de l'Est
Objet: Re: [Sisuite-devel] patch for a diskless support
Hi,
I am curious about the aproach taken
em; if someone is interested, it is still possible to
take them.
Regards,
- Mail Original -
De: "Erich Focht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À: "geoffroy vallee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Juillet 2008
If you have any other precise questions, Ferrol and I will be happy to answer.
Regards,
- Mail Original -
De: "Erich Focht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À: "geoffroy vallee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Envoyé:
Hi Bernard,
I will try to do that today.
Thanks,
- Mail Original -
De: "Bernard Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À: "geoffroy vallee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Juillet 2008 17:55:25 GMT -05:00 U
Hi all,
I did a "port" of SystemImager to Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64 since i was facing quite
a few challenges with the latest unstable tag. This port is based on the 4.1.6
unstable tag (that version was selected for different reasons that i cannot
explain here) and is based on a 3.2 kernel.
I tested
38 matches
Mail list logo
