Hi all,
The package creation is based on the kernel version shipped with Debian. I
do not want to change the kernel by default. It is the approach selected by
Dann and i think it is the best one. Debian developers spend a lot of time
to ship a kernel coherent for the distribution, i think it is a bad idea to
want to change that.
If someone wants to change that, i think the person has to take contact with
the Debian team in charge of the kernel packaging or, other solution, create
a new package and port all driver packages available in Debian. But clearly,
i do not want to do that. :-)
Moreover, remember, if you want to include a package within the official
Debian distribution and if you package is based on the kernel, you must use
the kernel by default.
Regards,
2006/12/17, Erich Focht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sunday 17 December 2006 11:40, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Instead, I've another question... regarding patch 02 I've not understood
> why you changed the default kernel version. The 2.6.18.1 has been
> strongly tested and it seems to work well with all the other
> systemimager components...
Indeed, we should rather move forward in the kernel versions, not
backwards. In average this brings us more and better device drivers
support.
Regards,
Erich
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
sisuite-devel mailing list
sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
