On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:36 AM Guillermo wrote:
> You don't need to do that. You *can* install the full set of execline
> binaries in /usr/lib/execline using --enable-absolute-paths, (and you
> should add --shebangdir=\$${prefix}/lib/execline too), just like in
> your OP. Both s6 and s6-rc should
El dom., 2 sept. 2018 a las 13:48, Shengjing Zhu escribió:
>
> From your previous comment, s6 not only uses execline library, but
> also its binaries. Can I get a list of binaries that s6 will use? So I
> can only package these.
You don't need to do that. You *can* install the full set of execline
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:32 AM Laurent Bercot wrote:
> I will then suggest that you refrain from packaging execline for
> Debian
Somehow I agree that, I don't want to be the person who bring
controversy with upstream and distributions.
The real software I want to package is s6. I do use it in
But I probably will not install binaries like `if, exec, wait` to
default PATH(like /usr/bin). Although I understand this is possible
technically(and currently no other programs claim these names).
The actual reason is that I can't afford time to argue with other
developers. When I ask on debian-
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 11:17:20PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> The actual reason is that I can't afford time to argue with other
> developers. When I ask on debian-devel list, at least someone is
> object to this[1]. I'd to admit that I'm not good at argument. The
> simple solution I see is to pu
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 6:05 PM Laurent Bercot wrote:
> When you write 'execlineb -c "if { foo } blah"', the execlineb binary
> will execute into an argv starting with "if". If the "if" command
> isn't in its PATH, then it won't find it.
> --enable-absolute-paths cannot rewrite it into "/usr/li
Thanks for this note, I haven't looked at these packages. At first I
thought execline binaries will only be called inside execlinep
scripts. Could you give some examples that s6 calls these binaries
directly except exelinep?
In addition to what Casper said: for instance, some of the
s6-fdholder
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 02:12:47PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Thanks for this note, I haven't looked at these packages. At first I
> thought execline binaries will only be called inside execlinep
> scripts. Could you give some examples that s6 calls these binaries
> directly except exelinep?
My