On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:32 AM Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> wrote: > I will then suggest that you refrain from packaging execline for > Debian
Somehow I agree that, I don't want to be the person who bring controversy with upstream and distributions. The real software I want to package is s6. I do use it in my containers as a supervision. I think s6 won't have such problems since all its binaries having s6- prefix. Packaging s6 will be double-wins. >From your previous comment, s6 not only uses execline library, but also its binaries. Can I get a list of binaries that s6 will use? So I can only package these. As a result, users won't get execline from Debian, but just s6, which is not broken. -- Shengjing Zhu <[email protected]> GPG Key: 0xCF0E265B7DFBB2F2 Homepage: https://zhsj.me
