Hello,
I have new issues with the current s6-rc git head (after yesterday's
bugfixes), discovered with the following scenario: a service database
with only two longruns, producersvc and loggersvc, the latter
being the former' s logger. Loggersvc's service definition directory
had only
Should be all fixed, thanks!
--
Laurent
On 22/08/2015 08:26, Colin Booth wrote:
I run my s6 stuff in slashpackage configuration so I missed the
s6-fdholder-filler issue. The slashpackage puts full paths in for all
generated run scripts so I'm a little surprised it isn't doing that
for standard FHS layouts.
FHS doesn't guarantee
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Guillermo gdiazhartu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have the following issues with the current s6-rc git head (last
commit 8bdcc09f699a919b500885f00db15cd0764cebe1):
(snip)
I run my s6 stuff in slashpackage configuration so I missed the
s6-fdholder-filler
Hello,
I have the following issues with the current s6-rc git head (last
commit 8bdcc09f699a919b500885f00db15cd0764cebe1):
* s6-rc-compile doesn't copy the 'nosetsid' file in the service
definition directory of a longrun to the compiled database directory.
* s6-rc-compile produces an error if
2015-07-12 2:59 GMT-03:00 Laurent Bercot:
s6-rc is available to play with.
[...] I decided to publish what's already there, so you can test it and
give feedback while I'm working on the rest. You can compile service
definition directories, look into the compiled database, and run the
On 19/07/2015 20:13, Guillermo wrote:
Well, I haven't been very lucky with oneshots. First, the #!execline
shebang with no absolute path doesn't work on my system, even if the
execlineb program can be found via the PATH environment variable.
Neither does #!bash, #!python, or any similar
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
skar...@clacke.user.lysator.liu.se wrote:
On 17-Jul-2015 12:49 am, Colin Booth cathe...@gmail.com wrote:
Depending on your cron, users might be able to simply put an @reboot
s6-svscan in their user crontab. I don't see many drawbacks with
On 17/07/2015 09:26, Rafal Bisingier wrote:
So I run them as a service with sleep BIG in
finish script (it's usually unimportant if this runs on same hours
every day). I can have this sleep in the main process itself, but it
isn't really it's job
I also use a supervision infrastructure as a
On 16/07/2015 19:22, Colin Booth wrote:
You're right, ./run is up, and being in ./finish doesn't count as up.
At work we use a lot of runit and have a lot more services that do
cleanup in their ./finish scripts so I'm more used to the runit
handling of down statuses (up for ./run, finish for
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Laurent Bercot ska-skaw...@skarnet.org wrote:
Ah, so that's why you didn't like the must not exist yet requirement.
OK, got it.
Yeah, mounting another tmpfs inside the noexec tmpfs can work, thanks
for the idea. It's still ugly, but a bit less ugly than the
On 13/07/2015 17:35, Colin Booth wrote:
Those options are all bad. My workaround was to mount a new tmpfs
inside of run (that wasn't noexec) but that made using s6-rc annoying
due to the no directory requirement. I don't think there's anything
inherently bad about nesting mounts in this way
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Laurent Bercot
ska-skaw...@skarnet.org wrote:
So I decided to publish what's already there, so you can test it and
give feedback while I'm working on the rest. You can compile service
definition directories, look into the compiled database, and run the
13 matches
Mail list logo
